Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00222583DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008. 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargeme

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00222583
Pages
3
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008. 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargeme

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008. 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargement of time. Moreover, no attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of the Defendant. 4. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States. See Exhibit "B". 5. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), Plaintiff applies to this Honorable Court for the entry of default judgment against the Defendant. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermanlaw.com - 1 - EFTA00222583 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29.2008 Page 2 of 3 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 2, respectfully requests this Court to grant this motion in favor of Plaintiff and enter a default against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Dated: May 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted, By: 5/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Adam D. Horowitz HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN. P. A. www.hermanlaw.com - 2 - EFTA00222584 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29.2008 Page 3 of 3 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jeffrey Epstein (Via Regular Mail) 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021 /s/ Adam D. Horowitz HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN. P. A. ww.v.hermanlaw.com EFTA00222585

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80119-KAM
Domainww.v.hermanlaw.com
Domainwww.hermanlaw.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660024

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/0612008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND AGREED DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS EFTA00222397 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 08(0612008 Page 2 of 2 Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5, and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, file this Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation of Acceptance of Service of Process and Agreed Date for Defendant's Respo

6p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01660040

37p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728830

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.