Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008. 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargeme
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008. 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargeme
Persons Referenced (3)
“...spectfully submitted, By: 5/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jan...”
Jeffrey M. Herman“...EIN. Dated: May 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted, By: 5/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A....”
Jeffrey Epstein“...FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by ...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80119-KAMww.v.hermanlaw.comwww.hermanlaw.comRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01660024
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/0612008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND AGREED DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS EFTA00222397 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 08(0612008 Page 2 of 2 Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5, and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, file this Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation of Acceptance of Service of Process and Agreed Date for Defendant's Respo
EFTA02729648
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
EFTA01660040
EFTA02728830
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.