Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00222921DOJ Data Set 9

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM

Other

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, through counsel, opposes the Defendant Motion to Set Aside Default. Defendant offers no proof that she did not actually receive the service of process; she says she "contests" the efforts but offers no evidence to contest the Affidavit of the process server, who made six (6) attempts to serve before being forced to resort to "nail and mail" service, valid under New York law. Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. . Boulevard Burgers Corporation, 52 A.D. 3d 1150, 861 N.Y.S. 2d 808 (N.Y.S.C., Appellate Division, June 26, 2008). Defendant first argues that Plaintiffs Motion is defective because the Pl

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00222921
Pages
4
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.