Case No. 08-80736-CV-MAFtRA
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MAFtRA P-009104 Exhibit 5 EFTA00224230 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary ..•••••• 7--Meeting (US: DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Letcourt). and a es itt uyr en K11, era owl z, oy ac , Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). • Defense argument--Travel has to be for "the" sole purpose of engaging in sexual activity not "a" purpose. • Defense became aware of the Government's strategy to charge Epstein with Enticement in addition to the Traveling charges. • US Attorney's Office presented a State two-year incarceration plea agreement. • Defense stance was jail time was not an option. : oy ac , era cour an y anc ez iiionniemm • Case briefing to DOJ representative. IIIIIII. "'^ Alexander Acosta, , John McMillan, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, i y Sanchez). 9/12/2007--Meeting (US: DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Gerald Lefcourt and Jack 9/18/2007--Rescheduled date for computer hearing.(Hearing initially set for 9
Summary
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MAFtRA P-009104 Exhibit 5 EFTA00224230 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary ..•••••• 7--Meeting (US: DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Letcourt). and a es itt uyr en K11, era owl z, oy ac , Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). • Defense argument--Travel has to be for "the" sole purpose of engaging in sexual activity not "a" purpose. • Defense became aware of the Government's strategy to charge Epstein with Enticement in addition to the Traveling charges. • US Attorney's Office presented a State two-year incarceration plea agreement. • Defense stance was jail time was not an option. : oy ac , era cour an y anc ez iiionniemm • Case briefing to DOJ representative. IIIIIII. "'^ Alexander Acosta, , John McMillan, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, i y Sanchez). 9/12/2007--Meeting (US: DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Gerald Lefcourt and Jack 9/18/2007--Rescheduled date for computer hearing.(Hearing initially set for 9
Persons Referenced (6)
“...g (US: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcou --M e i US: J DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black. Gera! Le court an Li ly Sanchez). • Defense argument--Travel has to be for 'the' sole purpose of engaging ...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...Case No. 08-80736-CV-MAFtRA P-009104 Exhibit 5 EFTA00224230 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary ..•••••• 7--Meeting (US: DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Letcourt). and a es itt uyr en K11, era...”
Kenneth Starr“...to DOJ representative. IIIIIII. "'^ Alexander Acosta, , John McMillan, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, i y Sanchez). 9/12/2007--Meeting (US: DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA...”
Alexander Acosta“...n y anc ez iiionniemm • Case briefing to DOJ representative. IIIIIII. "'^ Alexander Acosta, , John McMillan, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, i y Sanchez). 9/12/2007--Meeting (US: DEF: Ja...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
12512001Related Documents (6)
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA
t i Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009104 EFTA00229718 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary 2/20/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: Jeff Sloman, and , DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). • Defense argument--Travel has to be for "the" sole purpose of engaging in sexual activity not "a" purpose. • Defense became aware of the Government's strategy to charge Epstein with Enticement in addition to the Traveling charges. 7/26/2007--Meeting (US: Jeff Sloman, call), and ). • US Attorney's Office presented a State two-year incarceration plea agreement. 7/31/2007--Meeting (US: Jeff Sloman, and DEF: Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). • Defense stance was jail time was not an option. 8/31/2007--Meeting (US: All and Mit • Case briefing to DOJ representative. 9/7/2007--Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta, , Jeff Sloman, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez). 9/12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
isiMoi keels to Starr
isiMoi keels to Starr EFTA00176157 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4Srne1 Miami. FL 33132 (303)961-9100. Telephone (303) 530.6444 Facsimile I write in response to your November 28'h letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily on that issue as well. I do wish to make some more general observations, however. Section 2255 provides that "[ajny person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of [enumerated sections of Title 18) and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation . . . may sue in
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 April 22, 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS la, Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Self-Report of Allegation of Conflict of Interest Dear Mr. I write to advise you that I have learned that lawyers for a target of one of my investigations, Jeffrey Epstein, have raised ethical concerns regarding my involvement in his potential prosecution in the Southern District of Florida. Specifically, I understand that Epstein's attorneys have notified Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher and/or her staff that I have an actual conflict of interest. As part of pre-indictment plea negotiations, the parties agreed that Epstein's victims would be allowed to collect civil damages from Epstein and that Epstein would provide counsel for the vict
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.