Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00224253DOJ Data Set 9Other

Montle Ju 16. 2007 12-01 PM

Sent: Montle Ju 16. 2007 12-01 PM oy er Here is the thumbnail version: At the time of the execution of the state search warrant on Epstein's house, they found printers. keyboards. and computer screens. but no CPU's. We thought that the property manager had destroyed the corn ut •rs. He was interviewed pursuant to a Kustigur letter and said that he didn't do anything with them, and a private investigator came and took them away. Based upon his description. we determined that the private investigator was Paul Lavery. We subpoenaed Paul Lavery. who tried to assert a blanket attorney-client privilege/work product immunity. I informed his attorney that he would need to file a Motion to Quash. so he backed down and we did a brief interview with Laver). Lavery stated that he did get the equipment from Epstein's house and he gave it to William Riley, another private investigator. We then subpoenaed Riley. both in his individual capacity and as custodian of records for Riley Kiraly

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00224253
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

Sent: Montle Ju 16. 2007 12-01 PM oy er Here is the thumbnail version: At the time of the execution of the state search warrant on Epstein's house, they found printers. keyboards. and computer screens. but no CPU's. We thought that the property manager had destroyed the corn ut •rs. He was interviewed pursuant to a Kustigur letter and said that he didn't do anything with them, and a private investigator came and took them away. Based upon his description. we determined that the private investigator was Paul Lavery. We subpoenaed Paul Lavery. who tried to assert a blanket attorney-client privilege/work product immunity. I informed his attorney that he would need to file a Motion to Quash. so he backed down and we did a brief interview with Laver). Lavery stated that he did get the equipment from Epstein's house and he gave it to William Riley, another private investigator. We then subpoenaed Riley. both in his individual capacity and as custodian of records for Riley Kiraly

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Sent: Montle Ju 16. 2007 12-01 PM oy er Here is the thumbnail version: At the time of the execution of the state search warrant on Epstein's house, they found printers. keyboards. and computer screens. but no CPU's. We thought that the property manager had destroyed the corn ut •rs. He was interviewed pursuant to a Kustigur letter and said that he didn't do anything with them, and a private investigator came and took them away. Based upon his description. we determined that the private investigator was Paul Lavery. We subpoenaed Paul Lavery. who tried to assert a blanket attorney-client privilege/work product immunity. I informed his attorney that he would need to file a Motion to Quash. so he backed down and we did a brief interview with Laver). Lavery stated that he did get the equipment from Epstein's house and he gave it to William Riley, another private investigator. We then subpoenaed Riley. both in his individual capacity and as custodian of records for Riley Kiraly (his private investigator firm). The subpoenas and attachment are attached. The subpoenas ask for the computer equipment removed from Epstein's house and information related to his employment by Epstein (billing records, etc.) so we know when the items were removed from the house. Before I issued the subpoena to Lavery, I talked with the Duty Attorneys at OEO and at the Computer Crimes Section in DC. OEO advised that. as long as the private investigator had a separate office/business (i.e.. was not housed within an attorney's office and did not work exclusively for u particular attorney), OEO approval wasn't required, it should be treated like any other subpoena. This morning I re-reviewed the U.S. Attorney's Manual and it is clearly applicable only to attorneys' offices. I asked Computer Crimes if there was any prohibition on subpoenaing computer equipment. and the duty attorney said that would be fine if we did not believe that the computer evidence would be tampered with. Before the Fourth of July. Lilly Sanchez called to ask for an extension of time to respond to several subpoenas. including the one for Riley. I granted an extension to tomorrow, July Ir. After that, another attorney filed a notice of appearance representing Riley. Late on Friday. July I3n'. Roy Black filed the attached letter. demanding to know which Deputy Attorney General approved the subpoena. Andy and I met this morning and crafted a response (attached), which we sent to Roy and Lilly. I also sent a letter directly to Riley's attorney of record (also attached). Lilly faxed Andy asserting that my letter did not address their concerns. We just had a conference call and the end result is that they are going to file their motion to quash by 4:00 tomorrow afternoon. Black tetter.pdf El El CI CI William Fusty lacy attachment Pity 16raly 070716 Richey Personal.wpd A.wpd .stockao of Reco. Itr.wpd 57 EXHIBIT 62 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-0 I 4026 EFTA00224253 Tracking: se 08-80736-CV-MARR.A P-014027 EFTA00224254

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Please click on link below

Subject: RE: Please click on link below Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:54:40 +0000 Importance: Normal Just FYI — The blog is, for the most part, completely nuts, but the link to William Riley is real. William Riley is the person who removed the computers from Mr. Epstein's house after Epstein or Roy Black somehow found out that I state search warrant was coming. (It was suspected that I court reporter at the state courthouse was the source of the leak, but never confirmed.) He also was one of the private investigators who investigated the agents and probably me during the investigation. Special Agent IM was followed to her home this past weekend, but it is believed that it was I reporter (British accent). ----Original Message--- From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:51 AM To: = Wifredo. (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: M, (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Please click on link below This is wackiest thing I have ever read. --Original Message-- From: csamoff Se

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: William Riley

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

THIS DOCUMENT IS PROTECTED BY THE ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND/OR THE ATTORNEY

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: William Riley

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.