Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00234060DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08'18'2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-bLOCH/SNOW C.M.A.. Plaintiff. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of Instructions (DE 2), Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1(B) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the parties submit the following Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report. A. The Parties Have Conferred. On August 11, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff, C.M.A., and for defendants Jeffrey Epstein and conferred by telephone for the purposes prescribed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although defendant ms not been served, her counsel participated in this conference as directed in the Court's Order of Instructions. The plaintiff agrees thaM partici

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00234060
Pages
8
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08'18'2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-bLOCH/SNOW C.M.A.. Plaintiff. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of Instructions (DE 2), Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1(B) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the parties submit the following Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report. A. The Parties Have Conferred. On August 11, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff, C.M.A., and for defendants Jeffrey Epstein and conferred by telephone for the purposes prescribed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although defendant ms not been served, her counsel participated in this conference as directed in the Court's Order of Instructions. The plaintiff agrees thaM partici

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08'18'2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-bLOCH/SNOW C.M.A.. Plaintiff. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of Instructions (DE 2), Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1(B) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the parties submit the following Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report. A. The Parties Have Conferred. On August 11, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff, C.M.A., and for defendants Jeffrey Epstein and conferred by telephone for the purposes prescribed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although defendant ms not been served, her counsel participated in this conference as directed in the Court's Order of Instructions. The plaintiff agrees thaM participation in this conference does not waive any objections to service or jurisdiction. EFTA00234060 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:1812008 Page 2 of 8 B. Statement of Claim 1. The Plaintiff's Claims The plaintiff alleges that she was assaulted by defendant Epstein while she was a minor. Plaintiff further alleges that defendantMibetted Epstein's acts of assault. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants' conduct caused her to suffer mental anguish, mental pain and suffering, psychic trauma and a loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of life. The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages in excess of $15,000, plus costs. 2. Defendants' Defenses As of the date of this Joint Scheduling Report, the defendants have not filed an answer or asserted defenses. Defendan•s not yet been served with process. C. Summary of Uncontested Facts None. D. Discovery The parties anticipate that discovery will include written discovery requests, third-party subpoenas, and depositions of individuals and government officials. E. Proposed Dates and Deadlines The parties agree that this case is appropriate for the standard track, pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(A)(2)(b), with trial estimated at 10 days and 269 days to complete discovery. The parties note that these dates may need to be adjusted depending on the resolution of issues involving service of process on defendan 2 EFTA00234061 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:182008 Page 3 of 8 Event Date Join other parties December 1, 2008 Amend pleadings in accordance with the Federal Rules December 1, 2008 Complete mediation June 30, 2009 Exchange Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures October 1, 2008 Exchange of Expert Reports February 27, 2009 Exchange of Trial Witness List April 30, 2009 Completion of all discovery May 28, 2009 (269 days from 9/1/08) Deadline for filing dispositive motions. July 30, 2009 File joint pretrial stipulation (including proposed jury instructions and joint summary of motions in limine) August 31, 2009 Pretrial conference September 15, 2009 Trial October 1, 2009 F. Estimated Length of Trial; Jury or Non-Jury The parties estimate that the trial will take approximately 10 trial days. Plaintiff has demanded a jury trial. G. Anticipated Motions The plaintiff anticipates that she will be filing a motion to add a claim for punitive damages, as soon as the pending motions (see Pam. H, infra.) are resolved. H. Pending Motions On July 25, 2008, the defendants filed a sealed Motion to Stay this action during the pendency of a parallel federal criminal action involving the same subject matter and same 3 EFTA00234062 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 4 of 8 parties. It is anticipated that the motion will be fully briefed and ripe for review by August 18, 2008. I. Legal or Factual Aspects Requiring Court's Special Consideration 1. Defendants' motion to stay pending conclusion of parallel federal criminal action. 2. Defendants' constitutional privileges arising from a pending criminal action. .1. Statement of Need or Agreement to Refer Matters to Magistrate Judge The parties consent to the referral of all discovery issues to the Magistrate Judge. K. Status and Likelihood of Settlement The parties have briefly discussed the possibility of settlement and will continue to explore the possibility of settlement as the case proceeds. L. Other Matters Required by Local Rule 16.1B 1. The likelihood of appearance in the action of additional parties. At this time, the parties do not anticipate the joinder of additional parties. However, counsel for the plaintiff wishes to reserve the right to join any additional defendants identified in discovery and has asked to have until December I, 2008 to do so. 2. Proposed Limits on the Time to File and Hear Dispositive Motions. The parties agree that pretrial motions should be filed no later than July 30, 2009 and request that they be heard and decided by the Pre-Trial Conference. 3. Proposals for the formulation and simplification of issues, including the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses. The parties agree to work together to formulate and simplify the issues in this case. 4 EFTA00234063 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 5 of 8 4. The possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of documents, electronically stored information, or things which will avoid unnecessary proof, stipulations regarding authenticity of documents, electronically stored information or things, and the need for advance rulings from the Court on admissibility of evidence. The parties agree to work together to stipulate to the authenticity of documents produced and obtained during discovery. 5. Sueeestions for the avoidance of unnecessary proof and of cumulative evidence. The parties agree to work together to enter into stipulations to avoid unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. 6. Any other information that might be helpful to the Court in setting the case for status or pretrial conference. At this time, the parties are unaware of any other information that might be helpful to the Court. M. Certification Regardirm Disclosures Required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and (21 The parties certify that disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)-(2) will be served by October I, 2008. In the event that the motion for stay remains pending at that time, the defendants may seek to extend this date. The Parties agree to supplement their disclosures as necessary. N. Names, Addresses, and Phone Numbers of Counsel a. Plaintiff Richard H. Willits Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 5 EFTA00234064 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:1812008 Page 6 of 8 B. Defendants Guy A. Lewis Michael R. Tein Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Bruce E. Reinhart Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Defendani 6 EFTA00234065 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:18'2008 Page 7 of 8 Respectfully submitted, RICHARD H. WILLITS, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 LEWIS TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 By: /s/ Richard H. Willits By: /s/ Michael R. Tein Richard H. Willits GUY A. LEWIS Fla. Bar No. 139888 Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff C.M.A. Fla. Bar No. 993522 BRUCE E. REINHART, P.A. & ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER 250 South Australian Avenue WEISS, P.A. Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: By: /s/ Bruce E. Reinhart Jack A. Goldberger Bruce E. Reinhart Fla. Bar No. 262013 Fla. Bar No. 10762 Attorneys for Defendan Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 7 EFTA00234066 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 18, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified above via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Is/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein 8 EFTA00234067

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80811-WJZ

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 0718/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Stay, as follows: INTRODUCTION Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay this action is based on the incorrect premise that there are criminal actions pending against him in Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 when Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to

9p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660024

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00013564

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16'2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal, filed July 10, 2008. Defendant seeks to file a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action under seal.' The Court has carefully considered the motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. As stated in the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, "proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record." S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978).

18p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, 1. Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue Plaintiff, Jane Doe, hereby brings this First Amended Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: 1. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of $50,000,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. 2. This First Amended Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe, because this Complaint makes allegations of sexual assault and child abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was a resident of the State

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.