Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2008 %le FILPIage 1 %B1 D.C. ELECTRONIC JANE DOE, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant A UGUST 13, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 0 gCV g .°S2193 /Mtn / LRJ 08-80893-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. 5. D. OF FLA. • MIAMI FILED by AUG 13 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 0151: CT S.O. OF FLA. • W P.S. D.C. MOTION TO KEEP TRUE NAME IN SEALED ENVELOPE The Plaintiff, Jane Doe, moves this Court that, due to the sensitive nature of the matters contained in the accompanying Complaint, the true name affidavit of Jane Doe, a pseudonym, presented to the Court concurrently with this Motion, be held by the Court in a sealed envelope to preserve the anonymity of the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, and that the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, be allowed to continue in this case under this pseudonym on the ground that revelation of the Plaintiff, Jane D
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2008 %le FILPIage 1 %B1 D.C. ELECTRONIC JANE DOE, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant A UGUST 13, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 0 gCV g .°S2193 /Mtn / LRJ 08-80893-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. 5. D. OF FLA. • MIAMI FILED by AUG 13 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 0151: CT S.O. OF FLA. • W P.S. D.C. MOTION TO KEEP TRUE NAME IN SEALED ENVELOPE The Plaintiff, Jane Doe, moves this Court that, due to the sensitive nature of the matters contained in the accompanying Complaint, the true name affidavit of Jane Doe, a pseudonym, presented to the Court concurrently with this Motion, be held by the Court in a sealed envelope to preserve the anonymity of the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, and that the Plaintiff, Jane Doe, be allowed to continue in this case under this pseudonym on the ground that revelation of the Plaintiff, Jane D
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80893-KAMRelated Documents (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
EFTA02726140
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.