Case Fileefta-efta00234804DOJ Data Set 9Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Unknown4p3 persons
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant / RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO "CONSOLIDATION" OF CASES AND OBJECTING TO CONSOLIDATION OF DEPOSITION OF THE DEFENDANT AND TO ANY DELAY IN CURRENTLY PENDING DISCOVERY COMES NOW plaintiff Jane Doe No. 7 (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff' in this pleading), by and through her undersigned counsel, to respond in opposition to consolidating her case with other cases for discovery purposes. The Court should deny consolidation, without prejudice to Jane Doc No. 3 re-filing the motion with more specific information about what the consolidation would entail. As the Court is aware, there is currently a case management order in place in this case (DE 20), which sets the parameters of discovery. Jane Doe No. 3 (and, apparently, several other Jane Does r
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.