Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00235106DOJ Data Set 9Other

I. 2008 12:30PM

AJi. I. 2008 12:30PM LAW OFFICE- - 42ree/ ( ( eZea 21; AND ASSOCIATES August 1, 2008 USA Annnwv'e office VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. El I have received your July 25, 2008 letter indicating a change of course by the U.S. Attorney's Office and an apparent decision not to attempt to work out the undisputed facts in this case. If you would like :o continue trying to work out the agreed facts then, of course, we are willing to continue to work with you towards that goal. If, as you suggested, that would be unproductive given the limited issues the Court needs to decide, then please consider some additional paints below that may help to expedite this matter for the Court. As indicated in your letter, your current position is that the victims' rights were not yet triggered because no case was filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Consequently, your letter indicates that you will be presenting only two facts to the Court, namely: (1) there are no charges in the District Court filed ag

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00235106
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

AJi. I. 2008 12:30PM LAW OFFICE- - 42ree/ ( ( eZea 21; AND ASSOCIATES August 1, 2008 USA Annnwv'e office VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. El I have received your July 25, 2008 letter indicating a change of course by the U.S. Attorney's Office and an apparent decision not to attempt to work out the undisputed facts in this case. If you would like :o continue trying to work out the agreed facts then, of course, we are willing to continue to work with you towards that goal. If, as you suggested, that would be unproductive given the limited issues the Court needs to decide, then please consider some additional paints below that may help to expedite this matter for the Court. As indicated in your letter, your current position is that the victims' rights were not yet triggered because no case was filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Consequently, your letter indicates that you will be presenting only two facts to the Court, namely: (1) there are no charges in the District Court filed ag

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
AJi. I. 2008 12:30PM LAW OFFICE- - 42ree/ ( ( eZea 21; AND ASSOCIATES August 1, 2008 USA Annnwv'e office VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. El I have received your July 25, 2008 letter indicating a change of course by the U.S. Attorney's Office and an apparent decision not to attempt to work out the undisputed facts in this case. If you would like :o continue trying to work out the agreed facts then, of course, we are willing to continue to work with you towards that goal. If, as you suggested, that would be unproductive given the limited issues the Court needs to decide, then please consider some additional paints below that may help to expedite this matter for the Court. As indicated in your letter, your current position is that the victims' rights were not yet triggered because no case was filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Consequently, your letter indicates that you will be presenting only two facts to the Court, namely: (1) there are no charges in the District Court filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Jeffrey Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Florida State Court on June 30, 2008, was sentenced, and is now imprisoned in Palm Beach County. We can certainly agree to those two facts. I am writing to see whether you would also be willing to include two additional uncontested facts in your Notice to the Court. The facts we would like you to include arc: (3) As a result of the guilty pleas in Florida State Court entered on June 30, 2008, there is currently in place a "non-prosecution" agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida that precludes filing of federal criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein for federal sex crimes committed against the victims in this matter. (4) While this non-prosecution agreement was negotiated between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 (and amended twice more during that year), the victims and their attorneys were not told about the non-prosecution agreement until after June 30, 2008, because of an express confidentiality provision in the agreement that the U.S. Attorney's Office, the FBI, and other federal agents all complied with. EFTA00235106 An. 1. 2008 12:3081V No. 1.774 P. AUSA awe es Attorney's Office Page Two In suggesting these stipulations, I am not foreclosing presenting other facts on behalf of the victims if the Court determines that other facts are necessary to have before the Court in order to effectively rule on these issues. It just seems to me that points (3) and (4) are so obviously uncontested, that your office would be willing to stipulate to them and make those facts available to the Court for consideration. It is unclear from your recent letter whether you intend to give the victims the courtesy of seeing the full and complete non-prosecution agreement that was signed by the parties and that now covers their case. Your previous proposed stipulation of undisputed facts stated: "On July 9, 2008, AUSA sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards, which is attached as Exhibit 6 to the Declaration. That notification contains a written explanation of the full terms of the agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney s Office." While it appears by this statement to have been your intent to provide the victims with a true and accurate copy of that non-prosecution agreement, that agreement has not yet been produced to them. While it is likely a mere oversight on your part, we would again request a true and accurate copy of the complete non-prosecution agreement that apparently bars federal prosecution of the man who committed sexual crimes against my clients. Additionally, we would request again that if statements of my clients were taken by FBI agents or your office, that those interview reports containing those statements be produced to us. Finally, I continue to request that you assist the victims in this case by securing a transcript of the hearing on their petition. Your letter did not address that request, and we would hope that your office would assist the innocent and indigent victims in this case by providing that transcript. Thank you for your attention to these concerns. Sincerely, BFisg Brad Edwards EFTA00235107

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660111

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.