Case Fileefta-efta00235277DOJ Data Set 9Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 223
Unknown9p4 persons
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 223
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 223 Entered on FLSD Docket 11'01 '2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v . JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTIONS TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS Pursuant to the ruling of United States District Court, [D.E. 222], the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), files his Reply to the Response to Real Party in Interest, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Disclosure of Certain Documents [D.E. 217]. I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The records for which Epstein seeks protection from disclosure were ordered to be produced because they were found by this Court to be relevant or might lead to relevant evidence in an action
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.