Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00373854DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: =

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00373854
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: = >• To: Marie-Cecile Girard-Jones 41===> Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:18:04 +0000 Hi Marie...thank you for your reply...you are correct, Jeffrey has said he will not be able to attend...but he is still filling the table with his important friends...and one never knows if at the last minute Jeffrey may swing into NY and go himself (between you and me ;) I have passed along to him your questions re any concern or sensitivity...we will see what he says. ...and once you are completed with this arduous task of table management, please do let me know the results for Jeffrey's table position, etc. Thanks, Lesley On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Marie-Cecile Girard-Jones < > wrote: > Hi Leslie- > > We're still tinkering with the floor plan, so things are still up in the air. Of course, Jeffrey will have one of the premium tables at the event but that the precise locations won't be finalized until they have figured out how the stage will be placed. Is there is something about which he is concerned, or to which we should be sensitive? Also, based on the last info I have, I have Jeffrey as not coming to the event but filling is table. Is this still the case? > Thanks > MC > • Marie-Cecile Girard-Jones > Executive General Manager > The Hasty Pudding Institute of 1770 Original Message > From: Lesley Groff [mailto: > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 2:01 PM > To: Marie-Cecile Girard-Jones > Subject: Jeffrey Epstein > • Hi Marie...just following up...I know you were hoping to have the table and guest list all sorted out today...Jeffrey would love to know if there is any more details you can give. > Thanks, > Lesley > Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein > This message, and any attachments hereto, is confidential and intended exclusively for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged, subject to a confidentiality and/or non-disclosure agreement, or otherwise exempt or protected from disclosure (either by EFTA00373854 contract or under applicable law). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that printing, retaining, reproducing, copying, disclosing, disseminating or using this message or any information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the message (including any attachments) and any copies in their entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Nothing contained in this e-mail shall be considered a legally binding agreement, amendment or modification of any agreement with Island Capital Group LLC or any of its affiliates, each of which requires a fully executed agreement to be received by Island Capital Group LLC or such affiliate. EFTA00373855

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02357226

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01899736

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01899773

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01931324

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.