Skip to main content
Skip to content
From: Melanie SpinellaFrom: Appointment Ma>
Case File
efta-efta00469586DOJ Data Set 9Other

DS9 Document EFTA00469586

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00469586
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Russell Hernandez <I Cc: Russell Hernandez <I Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:26:20 +0000 0 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Russell Hernandez < > wrote: Yes ma'am Russell Hernandez On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:09 AM, Morning! Reconfirming you will come see Jeffrey today at 12pm! 9 East 71st Street between 5th and Madison Thank you, Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein Sent from my iPhone On Feb 13, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Russell Hernandez <1 Thank you Great making the connection!!! Take care Russell Russell Hernandez On Feb 13, 2018, at 3:09 PM, > wrote: > wrote: > wrote: EFTA00469586 Hi Russell..nice to chat with you today! Such a small world! Confirming you will come see Jeffrey on Thursday Feb. 15th at 12:00pm! Thanks and see you soon. Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00469587

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Cashkim Bussue

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01892963

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02519308

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02528889

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.