From: Lesley Groff c

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00470398

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Lesley Groff c t> To: Governor Bill Richardson Subject: Re: Gov in NYC March 27-28 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 19:20:10 +0000 HI Brooke...let me double check with Jeffrey...I am penciling it in for now!_(but will be in touch after talking to JE) > On Mar 8, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Brooke Lange wrote: > • Hi Leslie: > • Looks like Gov could do breakfast on Tues, March 27 at 830am? > • Thoughts? > • Many thanks, > • Brooke Lange > Office of Gov. Bill Richardson > 216 Washington Ave. > Santa Fe, NM 87501 >> On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:29 AM, Lesley Groff wrote: >> >> Hi Brooke! Happy 2018 to you too! >> We will include the Governor's dates on Jeffrey's itinerary! Jeffrey says he would Love to see the Governor while he is in NY...lets circle back to this as the date approaches... >> » Thanks, Lesley >> >>> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:52 AM, Brooke Lange < t• wrote: >>> >» Hi Lesley: >>> >>> Happy 2018 to you! >>> >>> Gov will be in NYC on March 27 and 28. He'd like to stop by and say "hi" to Jeffrey as it's been a long time... >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Brooke Lange >>> Office of Gov. Bill Richardson >>> 216 Washington Ave. >>> Santa Fe, NM 87501 >>> >>> >> EFTA00470398

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown