Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80119-KAMann.marie.c.villafana@usdoj.govRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
US District Court Civil Docket
US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Florida Southern (West Palm Beach) 9:08cv80736 Doe'. United States of America This case was retrieved from the court on Sunday, May 22, 2016 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket: Other Docket: Jurisdiction: 07/07/2008 Judge Kenneth A. Marra Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon (Settlement) Other Civil Rights (440) no cause specified None USCA, 13-12923-C USCA, 13-12926-C USCA, 13-12928-C U.S. Government Defendant Litigants Jane Doe Petitioner United States of America Respondent Class Code: OPEN Closed: Statute: Jury Demand: None Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Other Civil Rights Attorneys Bradley James Edwards LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL Jav C. Howell PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jay Howell & Associates PA ISM Paul G. Cassell PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED EFTA00211439 Miami , FL 33132
EFTA Document EFTA01377939
Page 3 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * For C.M.A., Consol Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Jack Patrick Hill, LEAD ATTORNEY, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, West Palm Beach, FL USA; Richard Horace Willits, LEAD ATTORNEY, Richard H Willits PA, Lake Worth, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 5, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 3, Consol Plaintiffs (9:08cv80119): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD AT
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 05:14:2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, EFTA00234817 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 0514:2009 Page 2 of 4 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaint
EFTA Document EFTA01387838
Page 3 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * For C.M.A., Consol Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Jack Patrick Hill, LEAD ATTORNEY, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, West Palm Beach, FL USA; Richard Horace Willits, LEAD ATTORNEY, Richard H Willits PA, Lake Worth, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 5, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 3, Consol Plaintiffs (9:08cv80119): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD AT
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.