Case File
efta-efta00763998DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Martin Weinberg" <
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00763998
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Martin Weinberg" <
To: "Martin Weinberg" <->,
"Jeffrey Epstein" <
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:13:16 +0000
Bob can also inquire whether the "Rule 16" discovery has been received and if so whether it has been
received subject to a protective order, formal or informal that can provide protection from civil
subpoenas - ordinarily it is the Govt which seeks to protect its criminal discovery from disclosure to 3d
parties - this, of course, may not be that case -
Original Message
From: Martin Weinberg
To: Martin Weinberg • Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Leave it up to Bob to determine whether Alfredo's attys are opposing compulsion motion - I will look
into validity of grounds to intervene on Monday
Original Message
From: Martin Weinberg
To: Jeffre E stein
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 3:01 PM
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
First thoughts - Alfredo testified in depositions - committed perjury by saying everything he had he
gave to Recarey - has not gotten state (or federal) immunity for other crimes - he would therefore
have rights to challenge the motion to compel
Assuming he chose not to do that, the issue would be whether you could intervene arguing that
according to Alfredo's own federal plea/statements/Govt compliant it is stolen property - check with
Bob + we can research ability of plaintiff to seek to compel the thief to produce the stolen goods
over the objection of its owner who, absent theft, would have 5th Am act of production privilege
protection
Original Message
From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Martin Weinberg
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:52 PM as usual you raised a good point" how do we keep Alfredos tele book out of the hands of the plaintiffs
attnys. marie wrote in the complaint that it was prepared by employees"
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
PROT0
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
PROT1
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Martin Weinberg"
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01687128
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: '
4p
OtherUnknown
Deutsche Bank El
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01287870
7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.