Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 239 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2013 Page 1 of 4

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00795136

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 239 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2013 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S THIRD MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGE Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Third Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Declaration in Support of Deliberative Process Privilege, and states: I. On September 4, 2013, this Court granted the government's motion for enlargement of time to file declaration in support of invocation of the deliberative process privilege. The Court granted the government until Friday, September 13, 2013, to file the declaration. 2. The undersigned expected to be filing, on September 13, 2013, a declaration from a Department of Justice Official to formally invoke the deliberative process privilege for documents from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and a declaration from the United States Attorney, to formally invoke the deliberative process privilege for documents generated by the U.S. Attorney's Office. When the undersigned did not receive a declaration from the Department of Justice by September 13, 2013, the undersigned believed that the DOJ had determined not to invoke the deliberative process privilege. 3. At the same time, the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, was reviewing the documents for which the deliberative process privilege was asserted, to determine EFTA00795136 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 239 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2013 Page 2 of 4 if he would formally invoke the privilege, but the review was not complete. The government requested an enlargement of time to September 20, 2013, to file the United States Attorney's Declaration. D.E. 236. The Court granted the government's motion. D.E. 237. The Declaration of United States Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer was filed on September 20, 2013. 4. On September 20, 2013, the Office of Professional Responsibility advised the undersigned that the DOJ had not decided against invoking the deliberative process privilege. The reason no declaration was provided on September 13, 2013, was because the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) believed the undersigned was working with another DOJ component and had obtained the declaration. The undersigned spoke with OPR, who advised that it needed an additional fourteen (14) days, to review the documents, and finalize the declaration. 5. Accordingly, the government respectfully requests an enlargement of time of fourteen days, up to and including October 4, 2013, to file its declaration from the DOJ in support of the deliberative process privilege. The government regrets seeking another extension, but the additional time sought is to enable the appropriate official to review the documents and formally invoke the deliberative process privilege. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On September 20, 2013, the undersigned contacted petitioners' counsel regarding the instant motion. Petitioners' counsel graciously did not oppose this motion. At present, petitioners' reply in support of their renewed motion for an order directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold relevant evidence is due on September 30, 2013, ten days after the filing of the government's declaration. D.E. 237. In the event the Court grant's the government's motion, the government respectfully requests that petitioners' date for filing their reply be 2 EFTA00795137 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 239 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2013 Page 3 of 4 enlarged to October 15, 2013. DATED: September 20, 2013 Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant U.S. Attorney ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 20, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer. Jaffe. Weissin Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the 3 EFTA00795138 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 239 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2013 Page 4 of 4 Attorneys for Intervenors University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 4 EFTA00795139

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 3

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi

32p

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO PETITIONERS' RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S SEALED MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING UPON RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DE 129] AND RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' PROTECTIVE MOTION TO COMPEL [DE 130] Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this Reply to Petitioner Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Response to the Respondent's Sealed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [DE129] and Response in Opposition to Petitioners' Protective Motion to Compel [DE 130]. For the following reasons and the reasons set forth in Respondent's Motion to Stay Discovery, the Court should grant the United States' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decision on the United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.