From: jeffrey epstein leevacation®gmail.com>

From: "Martin Weinberg"

EFTA Document EFTA01307795

f;L.....Z.U., 9riee ED: Sub-OR ID: Prearas Code 26 GDR,: Sae treattheitik 3540190474 Deby Tatman? N Cam tten . • 031E-NY-3027571 Cass Name: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING Operation Name Case Art Amanda N Young -.SEIZURE REVIEW . . Additnal Agent? No teed by SlatalLotal Office? I Store with Feder« teraneat? Federal Stan Warnal Otte? Additicsal Army Type SEIZURE State Date FIRE Bee. IL'« 07/11iP ri N t Fad Date FIRE Tyr.. Indicted Start Met. Warrant tests

From: '

From: Martin Weinberg <MINIM>

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@grnail.com>