Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01005346DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Noam Chomsky

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01005346
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Noam Chomsky To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Request regarding Noam Chomsky Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 04:03:27 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif a I wonder whether this should be the first priority. Seems to me that Harry is the one taking really disgraceful positions now, and his petition, with its ugly insinuations about Valeria (I'll skip about me), is coming to court very soon, and if uncontested and granted, will get rid of Max anyway. That aside, until I get the actual documents I don't really know what I can write that would be convincing, to the committee or to the public. I don't know the answers to the questions about distributions since 2009, or even whether the legally obligated sums were paid to me. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: i suggest you first write max s firm executive committee and pen a letter that you would be proud of it is beomes public On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: So now we learn that she won't pursue the matter of the missing 100+k. What next? Also, how do you think we should react to Harry's disgusting petition to the court demanding full authority over the Marital Trust, including the insinuations about Valeria? Right now waiting to see whether Max will respond to the queries. I rather doubt it. If legal actions are necessary, we're kind of in a bind. Have a good local attorney for writing wills, setting up trusts, and that sort of thing. But I doubt that he'd want to be involved in Massachusetts affairs. Any suggestions? Forwarded message -------- From: Noam Chomsky a Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:26 AM Subject: Re: Request regarding Noam Chomsky To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Cc: ' I hadn't realized that the conflict discussed in connection with Gene's proposal extending to pursuing the matter of the apparent disappearance of these funds. If Bainco continues to refuse to provide information, I will then have to pursue other methods. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Deborah Pechet Quinan <a> wrote: EFTA01005346 Dear Noam, I will follow up with Sam today as to the status of his response to my previous request. Beyond that, I will not be able to assist you in pursuit of any further action against Bain, due to my firm's previously disclosed conflict. Best, Deborah Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. MI Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates Group 255 State Street 7th Floor I Boston MA 02109 Assistant - Jayne Mahoney e-mail: I www.riw.com I BIO ; tihttp://www.riw.com/ riwemaillogosm.gif From: Noam Chomsky [mailto Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 7:24 PM To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Cc: Richard Kahn; Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Request regarding Noam Chomsky I haven't heard from you about this matter yet. It has been a long time. Can you let me know how things now stand. Noam On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Noam Chomsky < wrote: Have you received any response from Bainco about the missing funds? There surely has been time for them to find the answer. A lot of money is involved, and if they refuse to give the information, further action will be necessary. EFTA01005347 Noam Forwarded message From: Noam Chomsky Date: Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:42 AM Subject: Re: Request regardin Noam Chomsky To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Cc: Valeria Chomsky That's curious. Could you write again, and if he doesn't respond quickly we'll have to think about further action. That's a lot of money to just disappear. Noam On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Deborah Pechet Quinan a wrote: Dear Noam, Sam indicated he would get back to me and I did not hear anything further. Best, Deborah Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. MI. Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates Group 255 State Street 7th Floor I Boston, MA 02109 Assistant - Jayne Mahoney: e-mail: ,I www.riw.com I BIO http://www.riw.comi riwemaillogosm.gif EFTA01005348 From: Noam Chomsky [mailto Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 7:53 PM To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Subject: Fwd: Request regarding Noam Chomsky We never received ally information about this. Did you find out anything? Noam Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:37 AM Subject: Request regarding Noam Chomsk To: "Mr. Samuel E. Bain Jr." Cc: Noam Chomsky Dear Sam, Noam has requested that we look into a discrepancy on his behalf regarding a RMD distribution made on January 22, 2015 in the amount of $187,000. He states that he has been unable to determine where these funds went. In your records, it shows this distribution was made to the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust and then subsequently wired to his checking account. Noam states that a deposit was made into his checking account on that date in the amount of $70,000, but not the full amount. We can also see from your records that distributions totalling $150,000 were made from the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust during the period of January 26,2015 — February 4, 2015, which may account for some of these funds, but not the total, and none of these distributions show a wire/deposit into the checking account. We are unable to go any further in our investigation as we have no other records to check. Please let me know with whom on your team I can coordinate to look into this matter so that we can provide Noam with full detail into the disbursements associated with the $187,000 RMD. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance. Warm regards, Deborah Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. =. Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates Group 255 State Street 7th Floor I Boston, MA 02109 e-mail: 2fittp://www.riw.com /riwemaillogosm.gif EFTA01005349 Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos. NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for permitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipient of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and systems. NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for permitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipient of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and systems. NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for permitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipient of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and systems. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeeia®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01005350

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
URLhttp://www.riw.comi

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.