Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

From: J <jeevacation®gmail.com>
Case File
efta-efta01015171DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: J <jeevacation®gmail.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01015171
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: J <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Brad Edwards <1 Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 03:51:15 +0000 will reach out tomorw to him On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:39 PM Brad Edwards <1 > wrote: As far as David, I didn't talk to him again. If we get ours done then I will talk with him. But it might be easier if you continue to talk with him. I understand he agreed that you had a good first talk. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 28, 2018, at 10:37 PM, Brad Edwards c wrote: I still have not read the article. You always say how you don't watch everything. But I really don't. Nothing criminal in the statement. It's ridiculous that Marty is saying that. He's a great lawyer but just paranoid on this one. I made changes as you and Scott requested. After you and I made a deal, your team started renegotiating the apology part of it, without having any authority to renegotiate the other part. If it was not in jail then it must have been very recent. Because she only recently got out. Without lawyers, we can get things done. Impossible once you bring in the opinions of a bunch of lawyers. I am out of the country tomorrow through Sunday. My wife's birthday. I can't take any more time dealing with this. Especially after we reached an agreement. My flight is at 9:30 in the morning. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 28, 2018, at 10:21 PM, J <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote: just landed. will talk tomorrow david? any progress? , re apology i thought we agreed that the apology could not be an admission of a crime. the criminal lawyers are uncomfortable. courtney interviw for the herald . ? was nt she in jail? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and EFTA01015171 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01015172

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.