EFTA Document EFTA01365531

EFTA02031434

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

Federal Revenue Growth Data (1965‑2005) Compared to GDP – Economic Overview

The passage provides historical, publicly‑available tax revenue statistics sourced from the White House OMB and a consulting firm. It contains no allegations, unnamed individuals, or novel controversy Average federal revenue grew ~3% annually from 1965‑2005, roughly matching GDP growth. Corporate income taxes grew ~2% annually over the same period. Social insurance taxes (Social Security/Medicare)

Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement

Prosecution of students for censoring Ambassador Oren cited as First Amendment enforcement The passage describes a campus free‑speech case and the author's personal involvement, but it lacks concrete leads on financial flows, wrongdoing by powerful officials, or novel allegations. No high‑ranking actors or agencies are named beyond a generic prosecutor, limiting investigative usefulness. Key insights: Students (referred to as the "Irvine Ten") were convicted for censoring a speaker.; The author was asked to testify as an expert but declined.; The author defends the prosecutor’s decision as protecting First Amendment rights.

Corporate Outline for USA Inc. – No Evident Investigative Leads

Corporate Outline for USA Inc. – No Evident Investigative Leads The document is a generic financial outline with no names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It lacks any actionable or controversial content. Key insights: Document appears to be an internal financial review outline for a company named USA Inc.; Contains only high‑level headings (income statement, turnaround expert, consequences of inaction).; No mention of individuals, government agencies, foreign entities, or financial flows.