Case File
efta-efta01582928DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01582928
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01582928
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Copyright 1995 U.P.I.
United Press International
May 31, 1995. Wednesday. BC cycle
SECTION: International
LENGTH: 656 'suds
HEADLINE: Maxwell fraud trial opens in London
BYLINE: BY SHARMILA DEVI
DATELINE: LONDON, May 31
BODY:
The sons of the late media tycoon Robert Maxwell Kevin and Ian, and two other top executives from the Maxwell business
empire went on trial Wednesday on criminal fraud charges for alleged misuse of the companies' pension funds. The four
defendants have denied the charges of defrauding Maxwell pensioners after the mysterious death of Robert Maxwell in
November 1991. They are alleged to have misused shares belonging to the pension funds as collateral for bank overdrafts to help
prop up the Maxwell companies. On trial alongside the Maxwell brothers are Larry Trachtenberg. who was a director of various
Maxwell companies, and Robert Bunn, fonner finance director of the main public company in the Maxwell empire. Maxwell's
businesses collapsed and were found to be heavily in debt after he disappeared from his yacht Lady Ghislaine on Nov. 21, 1991.
His publishing companies included the Mirror Group whose flagship the Daily Mirror is Britain's second-largest circulation daily.
The chief prosecutor acting for the Serious Fraud Office opened the trial at a computer-equipped London courtroom by taking
great care to explain financial jargon to the jury. The judge has ruled that the jury of seven women and five men will only sit for
four hours each morning to allow them to digest the complex evidence concerning Maxwell's business dealings. Afternoons will
be used for legal argwnents out of the presense of the jury. The trial is expected to last six months. The prosecution accused
Kevin Maxwell of being the most responsible out of the four defendants for the misuse of pension fund assets.
He alone faces a charge of conspiracy with his late father in dealings in 5.4 million shares worth 100 million pounds ($160
million) in a Israeli publishing equipment company, Scitex Corporation Ltd., earlier in 1991. They are alleged to have used the
shares, which were pension fund assets, to obtain bank loans for the ailing Maxwell companies. All four defendants face one
count of conspiracy to defraud, involving shares worth 22 million pounds ($35.2 million) in Teva Pharmaceuticals, an Israeli
drug company, also in 1991. Justice Nicholas Phillips warned the jury as the trial started that they should disregard the
sensational publicity surrounding the case before the Maxwell brothers were charged. He said much of the media coverage was
"objectionable and unfair" and he told the jury to be on guard against prejudice and bias. He also warned journalists of legal
restrictions that limit reporting of the case essentially to details that are raised in evidence. Journalists can be held in contempt of
court for reporting background details. out-of- court interviews or other information that may prejudice the chances of a fair trial.
The restrictions lead to trial coverage that is far removed from the U.S. experience of celebrity trials like the current O.J.
Simpson case. Domestic interest in the Maxwells was highlighted by the 50-meter (yard) line of photographers and cameramen
waiting outside the courtroom to get shots of the defendants as they arrived Wednesday morning. No cameras are allowed in
British courtrooms. The trial is expected to be one of the most expensive ever to reach a British court, and British taxpayers
could face a bill as high as 25 million pounds ($40 million). The defendants have been granted legal aid for their defense, which
is costing an estimated 4.7 million pounds ($7. 52 million). The teams of top lawyers wearing traditional robes and wigs
contrasted with the modern courtroom equipped with computer technology that is rarely used in British courts. Computer screens
around the room allow lawyers to sec virtually simultaneous transcripts of evidence given by up to 60 witnessses and the
thousands of documents being used in die case. The system costs a reported 1,000 pounds ($1,600) a day.
WAD-DATE: June I, 1995
I PAC.E
Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase
JPM-SDNY-00062513
EFTA01582928
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01594320
37p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01838535
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02016521
0p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01402237
NAME SEARCHED: Darren Indyke PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC PC
79p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
DS9 Document EFTA00590045
51p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02004948
5p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.