Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01660005DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01660005

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01660005
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2008CF009381A STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO CLARIFY SENTENCE TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR COMES NOW the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorney and moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order clarifying the sentence to correct a scrivener 's error contained in the sentencing documents in the Defendant's case. In support thereof the Defendant would state as follows: 1. The Defendant was charged by Information in the above referenced case and the case was assigned to Criminal Division "W". 2. The case resolved by a guilty plea after plea negotiations between the parties. It was a condition of the plea negotiations that the case be resolved by June 30, 2008. 3. The case was scheduled for a plea conference on June 30, 2008 in Criminal Division "W", the division that this case and the companion case had always been assigned to. On that date, retired Judge Deborah Pucillo was substituting for the assigned Division "W" judge, Sandra McSorley, because Judge McSorley would not be sitting on that day. 4. Judge Pucillo handled all cases assigned to Division "W" on June 30, 2008 including that of the Defendant. 5. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered his guilty pleas on June 30, 2008 in Division "W" before Judge Pucillo. All plea documents and court commitments from court on June 30, 2008 reflect that this was a Division "W" case and was being resolved in Division "W", the division the case had always been assigned to. 6. As part of the negotiated settlement of the case, the Defendant is to serve a twelve month sentence in Case No. 2006CF009454AXX, followed by a six month sentence on this case, consecutive with the first twelve month sentence in the in Case No. 2006CF009454AXX. The Defendant is sentenced to twelve months of community control I consecutive to the two above referenced jail sentences. The community control sentence begins only after the two jail sentence have been served. EFTA01660005 7. On July 18, 2008 Judge Sandra McSorley, the permanent judge assigned to Division "W", signed an Order of Community Control, without notice to the parties, nunc pro tunc to June 30, 2008. The reason for this is that the substitute judge had neglected to sign an Order of Community Control in this case at the time of the plea. See the Order of Community Control attached as Exhibit "A". 8. The Order of Community Control signed by Division "W" Judge McSorley on July 18, 2008, contains a minor scrivener's error that needs to be corrected. The Order of Community Control could be interpreted to suggest that the Defendant was placed on community control on June 30, 2008 based on the box that the clerk checked when preparing the Order of Community Control. 9. The parties agree that the Defendant's twelve month sentence in the county jail on Case No. 2006CF009454AXX is followed by a six month sentence in the instant case. The parties agree that the one year period of community control is to only begin after the Defendant has completed his jail sentences. 10 Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek does not to object to Motion to Clarify Sentence to Correct Scrivener's Error. WHEREFORE the Defendant moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order correcting the scrivener's error in the original Order of Community Control clarifying the intent to the parties that the Defendant's community control sentence begins only after his jail sentence terminates. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail to Lanna Belohlavek, State Attorney's Office, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 4 th day of December, 2008. ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561)659-8300 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 262013 EFTA01660006

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728716

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020703

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728919

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 27, 2008 Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: Thank you for providing me with the proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office. The U.S. Attorney's Office hereby provides Notice that the proposed sentencing provision does not comply with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The second sentencing paragraph of the proposed plea agreement reads: On 08CF00938 1 AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 18 months Community Control I (one). As a special condition of this Community Control the Defendant must serve the first 6 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility ... The Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically provides: Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) mo

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.