Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01805184DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01805184

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01805184
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jessica banks Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2011 10:42 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: thoughts okay a few things - which, to upholding a new years resolution, i will =ry to be as succinct as possible in conveying... i didn't reali=e you wanted the writing yet (about axel, i am assuming) since i need the =ecording you have of the interview to really do that. i thought i asked yo= for this before. how can i facilitate this? i also wanted =o talk to you before starting to write (why i was trying to get a hold =f you starting on the 19th) b/c i came away from the interview with some i=eas that i wanted you to okay about both the global direction for all the =nterviews and thus the specific tone/process for the writing. Here is a= outline of my thoughts and what i feel i/we need to establish, though i d= believe this is better had as a conversation. my basic thought (which would really, really help SEO stuff and have bo=h scientific and financial value) is that we use these interviews for your=science website -- a NEW one that is actually interesting and engaging and=visually pleasing. Components of this website that i foresee are: an interactive/graphical visualization of topics and people/sci=ntists that highlights dynamic and interesting connections. we do this =ith Seed (the visualization part - i don't want to write about graphic= here so we can discuss this in person with a pad and pen). the topics/broad ideas: i've noticed what seem to be mo=ifs in your thoughts (these things could have small descriptions of YOUR b=g ideas and link to ways you discuss them with certain scientists). for=instance (not an all- inclusive list): money (duh, but what should be funded in your eyes, what would=other players fund, what should the UN investigate, what could inform, tea=h, enable (and also blow smoke up the butts of) your current clients altruism, society (not in the saving it way, though i don't th=nk you should shy away from cool stuff that might have positive side effec=s) beauty, elegance ` memory, longevity, evolution (maybe ev=n sex), competition cryptography software capabilities intuition the people: the scientists and the topics are =inked and dynamic. interviews are embedded in the site. now, after t=e Axel interview i felt that there needs to be some PEER REVIEW on some=of the ideas you bring up in the interviews - i.e., i need to talk to the interviewees WITHOUT you in the room afterwards. it's not that i don=tB93 think they tell you the truth about your ideas, i just think it'= hard to really extract which ones are the most EFTA_R1_00151440 EFTA01805184 worthwhile when they are s= ballistic and forthcoming (which is a beautiful aspect of how your brain =rocesses, but sometimes some ideas are based on grand assumptions which- a=though they are viable possibilities- might not demonstrate as convincing =n understanding of the underlying science that some of your ideas do conve=). you: we include a biography of you - a short one.=A0 we write about your philosophy for investment and lines o= inquiry - e.g., you are not interested in saving the world but this does =ot mean you do not outright reject altruism; you gravitate to open-ende= problems, not the ones that are focused on solving a very particular prob=em. * the proof: i feel it should be obvious which of these things/reople you actually DO financially support. this gives credibility. and =t also allows for space for you to do some of the other stuff which would =xponentially increase your SEO power by having links to universities, fund=ng etc. that could reciprocate. If you like these ideas we need to discuss the logistics of =his endeavor in terms of : time-line: a realistic one that won&=39;t defeat any one's expectations. (i am needing to take some other jobs lately so it would be helpful to me to have a schedule that we both =nderstand - i am willing to forego things for you but i also need to make =ome money in a way that allows me to forecast ). goal: is this SEO? is this to really give you a cool on-line pr=sence that can help you make money and can be used by us in other ways =o deliver information to different audiences the audience: important to agree on this? i dunno budget: do you want to spend your money on this and do you understan= what it will involve? I would foresee my role as being one of tr=nslater and integrator: making the interviews interesting and accessible a= well as the other parts that need content. i would be liaison with =nyone doing the actual website and make sure that all your interests and d=sires are met, that you (and your science peers) are conveyed as credible =nd accurate. i would help you filter. so basically that amounts to p=oject management and content provider. If you don't like this idea, we should talk about an alternative= I'll still need a better understanding of your audience, goals, et=. so i can be efficient about writing. AND I STILL NEED THE TRANSCRIPT. i apologize for bringing up the efficiency - it is my issue, but i tend=to do things 110% and feel the need to be cautious with you b/c i sometime= can't read your investment level or interest. also, i have had to =ake some other jobs so i can afford to keep figuring out where i stand wit= my company and how (and ,if - actually taking to heart some recent talks =bout making money that i have had with you) i can live comfortably while b=ing able to accommodate (at least part time) the things i want to create. =br> finally, we still (from the last email): "so i got a name / intro from a friend last week for an SEO guy. i was going to reach out to him but i wanted to talk to you=20 first about how to frame the project...( we just didn't get a chance to=20 discuss when i saw you last.) can we have phone convo about how i should proceed with=him? or would you like to contact him directly?" jess ps. i failed at being succinct. i am choosing not to let this prevent =urther attempts throughout the entire year. 2 EFTA_R1_00 151441 EFTA01805185 pps. i like you a lot. i want to work with you and for you to tru=t me. i can't separate you from your money (you probably can't =ither) but i know that i am truly dedicated to you as a mentor and a frien=. please, know this. --20cf3054a4d7ec569c04990cfab5-- date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1294180935 flags 8623750145 gmail- label-ids 22 2 remote-id 126432 3 EFTA_R1_00151442 EFTA01805186

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone4180935
Phone8623750145

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.