EFTA Document EFTA02018457

EFTA02018457

Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to [REDACTED - Survivor] Allegations

Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap

Epstein _ 001

yl . on on TRI ILITYUIY & JOHN CONNOLLY WITH Tim MALLOY A POWERFUL BILLIDNAIRE. THE SEX SEANDAL THAT UNDID HIM. AND ALL § THE JUSTIGE THAT MONEY CAN BUY: : | THE SHOCKING TRUE STORY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN ‘ de HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010477 5 ~ I] i A { doit see what it adds to the Rf ¥ ? Bl pois atm Desc . rely . BY crn nal ” CRE! hat © MO — Ju, a that time, no criminal L : 2 a irs had been lnuached. And In fa od he curaors of Fpstein's dealings [5 > a 110 be just that — Tumors. a J ie lawyers, his ed

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). Count II is directed only to Defendant KELLEN, who has not yet been served. In support of dismissal, Defendant states: Plaintiff, CMA, attempts to assert a cause of action against EPSTEIN in Count I of her Complaint. A review of the inadequate Complaint allegations establishes that Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action under either common or statutory law, and thus, Count I against EPSTEIN is required to be dismissed. R

EFTA Document EFTA01405372

NAME SEARCHED: 3. Epstein & Co PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC

EFTA01387839