Document references FBI contact with Jane Doe #3 and non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) involving Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Alan Dershowitz
Document references FBI contact with Jane Doe #3 and non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) involving Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Alan Dershowitz The passage hints at possible government motive and procedural irregularities surrounding the NPA that shielded Epstein from federal prosecution, mentioning FBI involvement and a high‑profile lawyer. While it lacks concrete financial data or new allegations, it provides a specific case number, dates, and names that could be pursued for deeper investigation into the NPA’s terms and any undisclosed agreements. Key insights: Jane Doe #3 was contacted by the FBI and chose not to cooperate.; The document disputes her later allegations against Alan Dershowitz as irrelevant to the NPA timing.; Dershowitz helped negotiate Epstein’s plea bargain but did not draft the NPA.
Summary
Document references FBI contact with Jane Doe #3 and non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) involving Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Alan Dershowitz The passage hints at possible government motive and procedural irregularities surrounding the NPA that shielded Epstein from federal prosecution, mentioning FBI involvement and a high‑profile lawyer. While it lacks concrete financial data or new allegations, it provides a specific case number, dates, and names that could be pursued for deeper investigation into the NPA’s terms and any undisclosed agreements. Key insights: Jane Doe #3 was contacted by the FBI and chose not to cooperate.; The document disputes her later allegations against Alan Dershowitz as irrelevant to the NPA timing.; Dershowitz helped negotiate Epstein’s plea bargain but did not draft the NPA.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
SE?Oet
M SE?Oet ASO Se , R‘N)C% 5C>CUMC- 7- f9 kCseriA/C GteCC Hi t\iCt :5122122, 1:31 PM --7—Jmrerepstent—galepedts Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with i November 3O, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward0161 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer EL-29i These and several similar lawsuits were dismissal Ea°1 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court: b$11 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.0.21 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rietts Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008 state plea. There was a later unsucc
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Maxwell Disputes
Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.