Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-010844House Oversight

Deposition excerpt on attorney-client privilege and alleged communications with David Boies regarding [REDACTED - Survivor] and Professor Dershowitz

Deposition excerpt on attorney-client privilege and alleged communications with David Boies regarding [REDACTED - Survivor] and Professor Dershowitz The passage provides a limited glimpse of a deposition where counsel cites privilege and denies prior contact with high‑profile lawyer David Boies. It mentions well‑known figures (Boies, Dershowitz) but offers no concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial transactions, or actionable leads. The content is largely procedural and already public in nature, yielding low investigative value. Key insights: Counsel invokes attorney‑client and common‑interest privilege to block questions.; Witness denies having spoken with David Boies before Dec 30 2014 about [REDACTED - Survivor]’ allegations.; Reference to Professor Dershowitz suggests the matter may involve high‑profile legal disputes.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010844
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Deposition excerpt on attorney-client privilege and alleged communications with David Boies regarding [REDACTED - Survivor] and Professor Dershowitz The passage provides a limited glimpse of a deposition where counsel cites privilege and denies prior contact with high‑profile lawyer David Boies. It mentions well‑known figures (Boies, Dershowitz) but offers no concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial transactions, or actionable leads. The content is largely procedural and already public in nature, yielding low investigative value. Key insights: Counsel invokes attorney‑client and common‑interest privilege to block questions.; Witness denies having spoken with David Boies before Dec 30 2014 about [REDACTED - Survivor]’ allegations.; Reference to Professor Dershowitz suggests the matter may involve high‑profile legal disputes.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightdepositionattorney-client-privilegelegal-strategydavid-boiesalan-dershowitz
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)'

From: (USANYS)' To: " CRM" II II Cc: " (CRM)" Subject: R -: n epee ent: Prince n rew: e sa to to to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:58:39 +0000 lane-Images: image001.png Thanks, The below looks good to us. On the penalties: Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423 (transportation of minors) — maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422 (coercion and enticement) — maximum penalty is 5 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591 (sex trafficking) — maximum penalty is 40 years' imprisonment From: (CRM) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 5:49 AM (USANYS) C (CRM) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. Has the witne

4p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jury demand filing in case 1:15-cv-07433 signed by David Boies and colleagues

The document is a routine procedural filing (jury demand) with no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the attorneys. It offers no investigative leads. Filed on September 21, 2015 in federal case 1:15-cv-07433 Signed by prominent attorney David Boies and other counsel from Boies Schiller & Flexner Requests a jury trial on all causes of action

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential. He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaig Dershow

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Affidavit alleges Alan Dershowitz visited Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion during alleged sexual abuse of minors

The passage provides sworn testimony from two Epstein household employees that directly places a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, at the Epstein residence while underage girls were present, inc Household employee Juan Alessi testified Dershowitz visited the mansion 4‑5 times a year, staying 2‑ Alessi said Dershowitz was present when [REDACTED - Survivor] was at the house and received mas

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Edward Epstein <

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.