Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

FOIA denial used to assert former President Clinton did not travel to Little St. James Island (2015‑2016)
Case File
kaggle-ho-010909House Oversight

FOIA denial used to assert former President Clinton did not travel to Little St. James Island (2015‑2016)

FOIA denial used to assert former President Clinton did not travel to Little St. James Island (2015‑2016) The passage provides a concrete FOIA request and a denial from the Secret Service, which can be followed up by filing a lawsuit to compel production or seeking related agency records. It links former President Bill Clinton and former FBI Director Louis Freeh to a high‑profile controversy (Island allegations). However, the claim is based on an inference from lack of records rather than new evidence, limiting its novelty and immediate impact. Key insights: FOIA request (April 6, 2015) sought Secret Service logs for Clinton travel to Little St. James (2001‑2003).; Secret Service responded (Jan 16, 2016) that no records were found in its indices.; Louis Freeh interprets the lack of records as proof Clinton never visited the island.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010909
Pages
1
Persons
7
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

FOIA denial used to assert former President Clinton did not travel to Little St. James Island (2015‑2016) The passage provides a concrete FOIA request and a denial from the Secret Service, which can be followed up by filing a lawsuit to compel production or seeking related agency records. It links former President Bill Clinton and former FBI Director Louis Freeh to a high‑profile controversy (Island allegations). However, the claim is based on an inference from lack of records rather than new evidence, limiting its novelty and immediate impact. Key insights: FOIA request (April 6, 2015) sought Secret Service logs for Clinton travel to Little St. James (2001‑2003).; Secret Service responded (Jan 16, 2016) that no records were found in its indices.; Louis Freeh interprets the lack of records as proof Clinton never visited the island.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancefoiasecret-servicebill-clintonlittle-st.-jamesvirginia-roberts

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law School 1575 Massachusetts Avenue Hauser Hall 518 Cambridge, MA 02138 Hon. Louis J. Freeh Mobile: 202.215.8321 January 22, 2016 RE: FOIA Request Dear Professor Dershowitz: As you know, on April 6, 2015, a request was made to the United States Secret Service under the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA; 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552), relating to the period 1/01/01 to 1/1/03, for "any and all shift logs, travel records, itineraries, reports and other records for USSS personnel traveling with former President Bill Clinton to Little St. James Island and the US Virgin Islands” (Attachment A). The basis of the above-described FOIA request was a claim by Virginia Roberts, in court papers filed in early 2015 in Florida federal court, that she and former President Clinton were on Little St. James Island at the same time during the 1/01/01 to 1/1/03 period. As set forth in a January 16, 2016 letter from Kim E. Campbell, United States Secret service Special Agent In Charge, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Officer, the "USSS has conducted a reasonable search for responsive records. It appears, from a review of USSS main indices, that there are no records pertaining to your request that are referenced in these indices" (Attachment B). I therefore conclude from this response that former President Clinton did not in fact travel to, nor was he present on, Little St. James Island between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2003. Based upon my experience and knowledge of the duties, protocols and operations of USSS Protective Details, the Special Agents accompany and escort former President Clinton 24 hours per day, and would have certainly went with him to Little St. James Island during the period at issue. If the Agents had accompanied the former President to that location, they would had been required to make and file shift logs, travel vouchers and related documentation relating to the visit. The total absence of any such records and documentation, in my opinion, strongly establishes that former President Clinton was not present on Little St. James Island during the period at issue. Best Regards, Louie Freeh

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Motion Seeks to Disclose Sealed Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] and Cites FOIA Findings on Clinton’s Absence from Epstein Island

The filing reveals a strategy to push a sealed deposition of a key Epstein witness to law‑enforcement agencies, cites former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s opinion that no Secret Service records exist of Dershowitz requests court clarification to share sealed deposition with State and US Attorneys for p Freeh’s FOIA‑based opinion asserts no Secret Service logs of Clinton traveling to Epstein’s island

18p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

FOIA denial used to assert former President Clinton did not travel to Little St. James Island (2015‑2016)

The passage provides a concrete FOIA request and a denial from the Secret Service, which can be followed up by filing a lawsuit to compel production or seeking related agency records. It links former FOIA request (April 6, 2015) sought Secret Service logs for Clinton travel to Little St. James (2001 Secret Service responded (Jan 16, 2016) that no records were found in its indices. Louis Freeh int

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe

Alan Dershowitz seeks court clarification to disclose sealed deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] to prosecutors for perjury probe The filing reveals a potential legal strategy to involve state and federal prosecutors in investigating perjury by a key witness who claimed to have been on Jeffrey Epstein’s island with former President Clinton. It provides concrete follow‑up steps (disclosure to the State Attorney and U.S. Attorney), names specific actors (Dershowitz, Roberts, Clinton, Epstein), and suggests a possible criminal inquiry, making it a strong lead. However, the claim is already widely reported and the filing itself is a procedural motion, limiting its novelty and direct evidence of misconduct. Key insights: Dershowitz requests permission to share the sealed deposition with investigative authorities.; The deposition concerns [REDACTED - Survivor]’s affidavit alleging presence on Epstein’s island with former President Clinton.; The motion cites a Jan 12 2016 Confidentiality Order that currently blocks disclosure.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Alleged false testimony linking former President Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein island and potential perjury by witness Roberts

The passage suggests a concrete lead that a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) is preparing sealed testimony alleging false statements by a witness who claimed to have met former President Bill C Roberts’ affidavit claims a meeting with Bill Clinton on Epstein’s island between Jan 2001 and Sept Former FBI Director Louis Freeh obtained Secret Service records via FOIA and concluded no record o

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.