Court filing references expert testimony on age‑of‑consent issues in Giuffre case
Court filing references expert testimony on age‑of‑consent issues in Giuffre case The passage merely outlines procedural arguments about expert testimony and jurisdictional age‑of‑consent statutes in a civil case. It mentions no new financial flows, misconduct, or high‑level officials, offering only a low‑value procedural lead. Key insights: Defense counsel argues victim‑blaming narrative could affect jury perception.; Discussion of protective order scope if parties reside in Australia.; Reference to age‑of‑consent statutes in Florida vs. New Mexico for a 17‑year‑old.
Summary
Court filing references expert testimony on age‑of‑consent issues in Giuffre case The passage merely outlines procedural arguments about expert testimony and jurisdictional age‑of‑consent statutes in a civil case. It mentions no new financial flows, misconduct, or high‑level officials, offering only a low‑value procedural lead. Key insights: Defense counsel argues victim‑blaming narrative could affect jury perception.; Discussion of protective order scope if parties reside in Australia.; Reference to age‑of‑consent statutes in Florida vs. New Mexico for a 17‑year‑old.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.