Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-011471House Oversight

Certificate of Service for Defendant’s Response in House Oversight Case

Certificate of Service for Defendant’s Response in House Oversight Case The document is a routine certificate of service listing attorneys and addresses, offering no substantive information about actors, transactions, or misconduct. It provides no investigative leads. Key insights: Date of service: March 17, 2017; Parties served: Sigrid S. McCawley, Paul G. Cassell, Meredith Schultz, J. Stanley Pottinger, Bradley J. Edwards; Law firms involved: Boies, Schiller & Flexner; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-011471
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Certificate of Service for Defendant’s Response in House Oversight Case The document is a routine certificate of service listing attorneys and addresses, offering no substantive information about actors, transactions, or misconduct. It provides no investigative leads. Key insights: Date of service: March 17, 2017; Parties served: Sigrid S. McCawley, Paul G. Cassell, Meredith Schultz, J. Stanley Pottinger, Bradley J. Edwards; Law firms involved: Boies, Schiller & Flexner; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards; Fistos & Lehrman

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightcourt-filingservice-of-processlegal-document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Maxwell Disputes

Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M

38p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01652143

39p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00032751

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01387837

Page 2 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * MARRA/JOHNSON,CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON,CASE NO.: 08-80893-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON,CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON,CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON,CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535 August 4, 2009, Decided August 4, 2009, Entered on Docket CORE TERMS: interrogatory, discovery, compelled, beach, particularized, responsive, chain of evi

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Florida Office

Cr 1) '.1.d Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman 't Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York. New York 10007 Dear New York Office J. Stanley Pottinger j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in I>istrict of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York Beard (:crtified Civil Trial lau)rr Re: Re tuest for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al., SDNY Case No. 1:19-cv-07773 Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relatin

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.