Alleged USAO Leaks and Victim Notification Scheme in Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement
Alleged USAO Leaks and Victim Notification Scheme in Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement The passage describes internal communications showing a U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) allegedly coordinating victim‑notification letters, encouraging civil suits, and leaking confidential case details to a New York Times reporter. It names specific officials (Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, AUSA Jeff Sloman, AUSA David Weinstein, AUSA Villafana) and links them to potential misconduct in a high‑profile Epstein case, offering concrete follow‑up leads (emails, letters, dates). While some details are already public, the alleged leak to the press and the proposed fee‑shifting scheme are novel angles that merit investigation. Key insights: Nov 27‑28 2007 emails/letters show USAO staff (Sloman, Villafana) preparing victim‑notification letters and urging civil suits under a non‑prosecution agreement.; Letter cites the “Justice for All Act of 2004,” later deemed inapplicable, and mischaracterizes Epstein as a “sexual predator.”; Proposed language would shift attorney‑fee costs to Epstein if victims used court‑appointed counsel.
Summary
Alleged USAO Leaks and Victim Notification Scheme in Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement The passage describes internal communications showing a U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) allegedly coordinating victim‑notification letters, encouraging civil suits, and leaking confidential case details to a New York Times reporter. It names specific officials (Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, AUSA Jeff Sloman, AUSA David Weinstein, AUSA Villafana) and links them to potential misconduct in a high‑profile Epstein case, offering concrete follow‑up leads (emails, letters, dates). While some details are already public, the alleged leak to the press and the proposed fee‑shifting scheme are novel angles that merit investigation. Key insights: Nov 27‑28 2007 emails/letters show USAO staff (Sloman, Villafana) preparing victim‑notification letters and urging civil suits under a non‑prosecution agreement.; Letter cites the “Justice for All Act of 2004,” later deemed inapplicable, and mischaracterizes Epstein as a “sexual predator.”; Proposed language would shift attorney‑fee costs to Epstein if victims used court‑appointed counsel.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Alleged USAO Leaks and Victim Notification Scheme in Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage describes internal communications showing a U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) allegedly coordinating victim‑notification letters, encouraging civil suits, and leaking confidential case details Nov 27‑28 2007 emails/letters show USAO staff (Sloman, Villafana) preparing victim‑notification lett Letter cites the “Justice for All Act of 2004,” later deemed inapplicable, and mischaracterizes Ep
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 1 of 5
Rol Slack lir „kite'
Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde
Jay P. Lelkoveltz, P.C.
IthibiSlornam
IthibiSlornam taco L•fhwitit EFTA00176182 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 M.E. 41' Street Miami, FL 33132-211! (305) 961-9299 Facsimile: (305) 530-6444 December 6, 2007 I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Our Office is trying to perform our contractual obligations under the Agreement, which we feel are being frustrated by defense counsel's objections. The Office also is concerned about Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. More than three weeks ago we spoke about the failure to set a timely plea and sentencing date. At that time, you assured me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that a date would be set promptly. On November 15th, Roland
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 gh Street Miami, FL 33132-2111 (305) 961-9299 Facsimile: (305) 530-6444 December 3, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Some of these issues also are addressed in the U.S. Attorney's letter to Mr. Starr, but in light of our discussions, I believe a separate response is needed. In a recent e-mail, you write that you were surprised at the tone of my e-mail of November 27, 2007. That tone was engendered by the roadblocks that you continue to erect as we try to perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter sets forth the last opportunity for your client and his entire defense team to conform unwaveringly
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.