Academic discussion of Piagetian stages and AGI development

188 11 Stages of Cognitive Development 11.2 Piagetan Stages in the Context of a General Systems Theory of Development Our review of AGI architectures in Chapter 4 focused heavily on the concept of symbolism, and the different ways in which different classes of cognitive architecture handle symbol rep- resentation and manipulation. We also feel that symbolism is critical to the notion of AGI development — and even more broadly, to the systems theory of development in general. As a broad conceptual perspective on development, we suggest that one may view the de- velopment of a complex information processing system, embedded in an environment, in terms of the stages: e automatic: the system interacts with the environment by “instinct”, according to its innate programming e adaptive: the system internally adapts to the environment, then interacting with the en- vironment in a more appropriate way e symbolic: the system creates internal symbolic representations of itself and the environ- ment, which in the case of a complex, appropriately structured environment, allows it to interact with the environment more intelligently e reflexive: the system creates internal symbolic representations of its own internal symbolic representations, thus achieving an even higher degree of intelligence Sketched so broadly, these are not precisely defined categories but rather heuristic, intuitive categories. Formalizing them would be possible but would lead us too far astray here. One can interpret these stages in a variety of different contexts. Here our focus is the cognitive development of humans and human-like AGI systems, but in Table 11.1 we present them in a slightly more general context, using two examples: the Piagetan example of the human (or humanlike) mind as it develops from infancy to maturity; and also the example of the “origin of life’ and the development of life from proto-life up into its modern form. In any event, we allude to this more general perspective on development here mainly to indicate our view that the Piagetan perspective is not something ad hoc and arbitrary, but rather can plausibly be seen as a specific manifestation of more fundamental principles of complex systems development. 11.3 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development The ghost of Jean Piaget hangs over modern developmental psychology in a yet unresolved way. Piaget’s theories provide a cogent overarching perspective on human cognitive develop- ment, coordinating broad theoretical ideas and diverse experimental results into a unified whole [Pia55]. Modern experimental work has shown Piaget’s ideas to be often oversimplified and in- correct. However, what has replaced the Piagetan understanding is not an alternative unified and coherent theory, but a variety of microtheories addressing particular aspects of cognitive development. For this reason a number of contemporary theorists taking a computer science [Shu03] or dynamical systems [Wit07| approach to developmental psychology have chosen to adopt the Piagetan framework in spite of its demonstrated shortcomings, both because of its conceptual strengths and for lack of a coherent, more rigorously grounded alternative. Our own position is that the Piagetan view of development has some fundamental truth to it, which is reflected via how nicely it fits with a broader view of development in complex systems. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013104