Defendant Dershowitz provides evasive, incomplete interrogatory answers in defamation suit linked to Jeffrey EpsteinSealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads
Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Brief filing note in Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz caseCase Filekaggle-ho-014117House OversightBrief filing note in Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz case
Unknown1p9 persons
Case File
kaggle-ho-014117House OversightBrief filing note in Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz case
Brief filing note in Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz case The excerpt contains only a routine attorney correspondence about filing a motion to compel, with no substantive allegations, names of powerful actors, financial details, or controversial actions. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Reference to case Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz (9:08-cv-80736-KAM).; Attorney Thomas E. Scott, Jr. indicates intent to file a motion to compel.; Mentions other counsel: Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell.
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-014117
Pages
1
Persons
9
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.