Defendant’s aggressive subpoena tactics in Florida defamation case involving former federal judge Paul Cassell
Defendant’s aggressive subpoena tactics in Florida defamation case involving former federal judge Paul Cassell The passage outlines a procedural dispute over a subpoena targeting a non‑party witness in a defamation suit. While it names a former federal judge and an attorney, it provides no concrete evidence of financial flows, illegal conduct, or high‑level political influence. The lead is limited to courtroom strategy and intimidation claims, offering modest investigative value but low novelty and limited public impact. Key insights: Former federal judge Paul Cassell and attorney Brad Edwards filed a defamation suit against an unnamed Defendant.; Defendant is alleged to have launched a national media campaign labeling the lawyers unethical.; Defendant seeks to subpoena non‑party Jane Doe No. 3, who is claimed to be a victim of sexual trafficking.
Summary
Defendant’s aggressive subpoena tactics in Florida defamation case involving former federal judge Paul Cassell The passage outlines a procedural dispute over a subpoena targeting a non‑party witness in a defamation suit. While it names a former federal judge and an attorney, it provides no concrete evidence of financial flows, illegal conduct, or high‑level political influence. The lead is limited to courtroom strategy and intimidation claims, offering modest investigative value but low novelty and limited public impact. Key insights: Former federal judge Paul Cassell and attorney Brad Edwards filed a defamation suit against an unnamed Defendant.; Defendant is alleged to have launched a national media campaign labeling the lawyers unethical.; Defendant seeks to subpoena non‑party Jane Doe No. 3, who is claimed to be a victim of sexual trafficking.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Motion to Quash Subpoena and Seek Protective Order for Non‑Party Jane Doe No. 3
Motion to Quash Subpoena and Seek Protective Order for Non‑Party Jane Doe No. 3 The passage is a routine procedural filing seeking to limit a deposition of an anonymous non‑party. It contains no substantive allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑ranking officials, and offers no actionable leads beyond standard legal arguments. Key insights: Jane Doe No. 3 is a non‑party resisting a subpoena for deposition.; The motion cites Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) for protective orders.; The request limits questioning to alleged defamatory statements about Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell.
Filing # 33747975 E-Filed 10/27/2015 04:45:57 PM
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Letter to Prince Andrew
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 3 WEST PALM RFACH OFFICF. 2139 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 P.O. BOX 3626 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART ef-SHIPLEY. 0TALI AHASSFF OFFICF. THE TOWLE HOUSE 517 NORTH CALHOUN STREET TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-1231 (561) 686-6300 1-800-780-8607 1-800-220-7006 Spanish January 14, 2015 ATTORNEYS AT LAW: ROSALYN SIA BAKER-BARNES T.GREGORY BARNHART T. HARDEE BASS, I
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.