Edwards & Cassell argue Dershowitz should not be allowed to reference sealed court records in defamation case involving Giuffre affidavit

Edwards & Cassell argue Dershowitz should not be allowed to reference sealed court records in defamation case involving Giuffre affidavit The passage reveals a dispute over confidentiality of court records that could expose statements linking Alan Dershowitz to alleged sexual conduct with [REDACTED - Survivor] and to settlement discussions involving high‑profile attorneys. While it does not provide concrete financial data, it points to potential misrepresentation and privileged information that warrants further document review and deposition follow‑up. Key insights: Dershowitz is accused of selectively quoting sealed records while preventing opposing parties from doing the same.; Reference to Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit alleging oral sex performed for Jeffrey Epstein.; Alleged misuse of confidential settlement discussions and misquoting statements by attorney David Boies.