Critique of Proprietary Algorithms in Criminal Justice and Calls for Transparency

Critique of Proprietary Algorithms in Criminal Justice and Calls for Transparency The passage discusses general concerns about opaque sentencing algorithms and trade‑secret evidence in courts, citing academic work but provides no specific actors, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It is largely commentary without novel revelations or direct ties to powerful individuals. Key insights: Algorithms are increasingly used in sentencing and parole decisions across many U.S. states.; Trade‑secret algorithms can hinder defendants' ability to mount a fair defense.; Rebecca Wexler's scholarship highlights legal risks of proprietary criminal‑justice tools.