Supreme Court Clerkship Preferences and Personal Anecdotes

Supreme Court Clerkship Preferences and Personal Anecdotes The passage only recounts historical clerkship numbers, personal preferences of past justices, and the author's own experiences. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level officials, making it low‑value for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Historical numbers of Supreme Court clerks in 1962 versus today (unspecified blanks).; Justice‑specific hiring preferences (e.g., Brennan, Frankfurter, Douglas, Black, Warren, Clark, Goldberg).; Personal anecdote about a conflict with Yale professor Fred Rodel over a men‑only club.