Judicial Commentary on Flight‑Guilt Instruction and Bazelon’s Influence

Judicial Commentary on Flight‑Guilt Instruction and Bazelon’s Influence The passage discusses a legal argument about jury instructions regarding flight and guilt, and offers personal reflections on Judge Bazelon’s legacy. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level officials, and offers little actionable investigative lead. Key insights: Mentions a proposed jury instruction that flight does not necessarily indicate guilt.; References judges Bazelon, Fahey, and Burger in a historical appellate context.; Cites psychological and literary sources (Freud, Dostoevsky, Wigmore) to support legal argument.