Supreme Court oral argument on obscenity case references bear‑baiting analogy

Summary

Supreme Court oral argument on obscenity case references bear‑baiting analogy The passage recounts a Supreme Court Justice's line of questioning during an oral argument and the subsequent decision in an obscenity case. It contains no concrete leads about wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level misconduct, and offers only anecdotal commentary on judicial behavior. Key insights: Chief Justice Warren Burger used a bear‑baiting analogy during oral argument.; The argument concerned privacy rights for theater audiences versus home privacy.; The Supreme Court ultimately decided the case on procedural grounds, not the broader obscenity issue.