Attorney recounts Deep Throat obscenity case and defense strategy

Attorney recounts Deep Throat obscenity case and defense strategy The passage provides anecdotal details about a historic obscenity prosecution and the author's personal stance, but offers no concrete new leads, financial flows, or involvement of high‑ranking officials. It is of limited investigative value and low controversy beyond already known historical facts. Key insights: Author claims to have avoided watching Deep Throat to argue for adult choice in obscenity cases.; Describes prosecution of actor Harry Reems for conspiracy to transport obscene material.; Notes prosecutor's theory that conspirators can be liable for future acts, even murder.