Griswold’s Commentary on Overclassification and Comparison of Pentagon Papers to WikiLeaks
Griswold’s Commentary on Overclassification and Comparison of Pentagon Papers to WikiLeaks The passage offers a general opinion on overclassification and the risks of modern digital leaks, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It references historical cases and broad concerns without new evidence linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Griswold argues most classification serves to avoid governmental embarrassment rather than protect security.; He suggests the Pentagon Papers set a limited precedent compared to modern WikiLeaks disclosures.; The text contrasts established media’s accountability with that of anonymous hackers and cyber‑thieves.
Summary
Griswold’s Commentary on Overclassification and Comparison of Pentagon Papers to WikiLeaks The passage offers a general opinion on overclassification and the risks of modern digital leaks, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It references historical cases and broad concerns without new evidence linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Griswold argues most classification serves to avoid governmental embarrassment rather than protect security.; He suggests the Pentagon Papers set a limited precedent compared to modern WikiLeaks disclosures.; The text contrasts established media’s accountability with that of anonymous hackers and cyber‑thieves.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.