Fourth Circuit reverses convictions of Hare Krishna guru amid claims of prejudicial evidence

Fourth Circuit reverses convictions of Hare Krishna guru amid claims of prejudicial evidence The passage details a court appeal involving a religious leader and alleged prejudicial evidence, but it does not implicate high‑ranking officials, major financial flows, or foreign influence. It offers limited investigative value beyond confirming a 2‑1 appellate decision and the arguments used. Key insights: Appeal argued that prosecutors introduced evidence of homosexual relationships, child molestation allegations, and misogynistic statements to prejudice the jury.; Fourth Circuit panel (three conservative judges) reversed convictions in a 2‑1 vote citing unfair prejudice.; Reference to a lawyer cousin, Morris Rosen, offering strategic advice about Southern judges.