Alleged Use of SERE Psychologists and OLC Lawyers to Legitimize Interrogation Practices

Alleged Use of SERE Psychologists and OLC Lawyers to Legitimize Interrogation Practices The passage suggests a systematic effort to mask harsh interrogation techniques by leveraging credentials of SERE program psychologists and Office of Legal Counsel attorneys. While it does not name specific high‑ranking officials or provide concrete transaction details, it points to a potentially unlawful justification process that could be investigated for violations of the Geneva Conventions and possible abuse of government legal counsel. Key insights: Claims that SERE program psychologists were present at interrogations to certify detainee psychological fitness.; Allegation that Office of Legal Counsel lawyers approved practices that may breach Geneva Conventions.; Describes a “circular logic” where credentialed professionals legitimize harsh treatment, effectively redefining it as non‑torture.