Court dismisses claims of terrorist support under ATA and RICO due to insufficient factual allegations

Court dismisses claims of terrorist support under ATA and RICO due to insufficient factual allegations The passage merely summarizes procedural rulings on pleading standards for alleged support of 9/11 terrorists. It contains no specific actors, transactions, or novel allegations that would generate a substantive investigative lead. Key insights: Dismissal of a charitable trust's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.; Court held that generic allegations of supporting terrorist charities are insufficient to state a claim under the Antiterrorism Act.; Similar insufficiency found for RICO claims when no concrete role or knowledge is alleged.