Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Personal S&M relationship narrative with no identifiable high‑profile actors
Case File
kaggle-ho-018620House Oversight

Personal S&M relationship narrative with no identifiable high‑profile actors

Personal S&M relationship narrative with no identifiable high‑profile actors The passage is a private account of consensual sexual activity with no mention of public officials, corporations, or government agencies. It lacks any actionable leads, financial details, or allegations of wrongdoing involving powerful entities. Key insights: Describes a consensual S&M encounter and use of a safeword.; Mentions personal dynamics and emotional reactions.; No names of public figures, institutions, or financial transactions.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018620
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Personal S&M relationship narrative with no identifiable high‑profile actors The passage is a private account of consensual sexual activity with no mention of public officials, corporations, or government agencies. It lacks any actionable leads, financial details, or allegations of wrongdoing involving powerful entities. Key insights: Describes a consensual S&M encounter and use of a safeword.; Mentions personal dynamics and emotional reactions.; No names of public figures, institutions, or financial transactions.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightpersonal-narrativeconsensual-bdsmrelationship-dynamics

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
We got along excellently, had a lot in common, etc. Typical this-relationship-starts-well stuff. One evening, after we'd been out to eat in a big philosophical group, Mr. Ambition noted the hotness of my intense theoretical bent. "When you were discussing social Justice and ethics tonight,” he said, "I wanted to reach across the table and grab you.” He mentioned marriage within weeks. "This has never happened before," he told me. "I've never dated someone I thought I could actually marry." Whoa, tiger, I thought, but I had to admit that he hit a lot of my Ideal Characteristics as well. Intelligence, drive, charisma, and morality: it's hard to argue with that. Our sexual chemistry was okay, but not climb-the-walls stellar. We'll develop that, I told myself. He's less sexually experienced than I am, and we'll learn each other just fine. Fortunately he's got some experience with polyamory, but in terms of S&M, he's another of those vanilla-but-questioning guys (I never learn). When we did S&M, I had to monitor the situation extra carefully because it was so new to him. And for all his intelligence, it was really hard to talk to him about emotions. It wasn't that he was cold or distant; on the contrary, he's one of the most fiery people I've ever met. But he had a lot of difficulty explaining what was going on in his head. Indeed, he told me that he had a lot of difficulty knowing what was going on in his head. He did things like laugh when a friend hurt his feelings, then deny that he was hurt, even though I could plainly see the stricken look behind his eyes. I wasn't surprised that he was more physical than verbal about S&M. Very straightforward: throwing me around, pulling my head back, digging his hands into my skin. He's incredibly strong, and sometimes I called my safeword simply because his strength scared me. There was one particular S&M encounter... early in the evening, I called my safeword because I wasn't sure he was into it. "Red," I said, and he stopped. "Is this okay with you?" I asked, and he nodded. "Yes," he said. "This is good. Let's keep going." His voice was low and slightly rough; a marvel of certainty. He put his hands back on me instantly. My doubts disappeared. We kept going. I watched my body, felt the lump building in my throat, monitored my breath as it became harsh and fast. "Red,” I said, and he stopped. "You're going to break me," I said, "I'm going to cry. If you don't want to deal with that, then stop.” This, by the way, is a difficult skill that I have learned: this ability to track my S&M reactions so clearly. I would never have been able to do it seven years ago, and I still can't do it during complicated S&M encounters. But now I can do it during simple ones. (Yes, "simple" and "complicated" are in the eye of the beholder.) I really hate stopping an S&M encounter right when I'm on the verge of tears. It's worse than an interrupted orgasm. But I'd rather do that than break down crying and then deal with a horrified partner. "That's fine," said Mr. Ambition. So we kept going. I cried. He started talking, and I was

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance The passage provides a brief anecdote of Trump’s phone call with journalist Bob Woodward, noting a claim that White House staff failed to inform him of the interview request. While it mentions a high‑profile figure (President Trump) and a senior aide (Kellyanne Conway), it lacks concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads. The information is already publicly reported and offers little novel investigative value. Key insights: Trump claims his staff did not tell him Woodward wanted an interview.; Kellyanne Conway is referenced as having asked Trump about a call.; Trump characterizes Woodward as "always been fair" but later calls the book inaccurate.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President The passage describes internal dynamics within Israel's Labor Party, focusing on Shimon Peres and internal votes for a ceremonial party presidency. While it provides vivid detail of personal tensions, it lacks concrete allegations, financial flows, or links to high‑level officials beyond party figures, offering limited investigative value. Key insights: Shimon Peres considered a ceremonial party president role amid leadership transition.; Party secretary‑general Nissim Zvili proposed the motion.; Peres faced vocal opposition from delegates questioning his motives.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Personal recollections of economic discussions with Nobel laureates

The passage is a memoir-style narrative about academic conversations on monetary theory and ETFs, lacking any concrete leads, names of officials, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct. Mentions Nobel laureates Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman discussing monetary ideas. Describes a proposal to treat ETFs and mutual funds as money-like assets. Speculates on banking structural ch

1p
House OversightUnknown

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations The passage is a mixed local sports article with no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or actionable leads involving powerful officials. It mentions Scott Boras' remarks on MLB team sales and a vague reference to the Mets' payment to a Madoff trustee, but provides no names, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing. The content is largely routine sports reporting, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Scott Boras likens Dodgers and Mets financial situations to supermarket categories.; Dodgers reportedly sold for $2 billion; Mets owners to pay up to $162 million to a Madoff trustee.; Mentions of high‑profile MLB figures (Mark Walter, Stan Kasten, Magic Johnson) in Dodgers ownership group.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.