Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-020218House Oversight

Snowden’s alleged 2012 data theft while contracted to Dell at NSA Hawaii backup site

Snowden’s alleged 2012 data theft while contracted to Dell at NSA Hawaii backup site The passage provides a detailed narrative linking Edward Snowden, Dell, and NSA internal processes to a specific 2012 data exfiltration at the Hawaii facility. It offers concrete names (Snowden, Deputy Director Ledgett, Dell) and a location, but the claims repeat already‑publicly known allegations and lack new documentary evidence or financial details, limiting its investigative novelty and impact. Key insights: Snowden was employed by Dell as a system administrator for an NSA backup system in Hawaii.; Deputy Director Ledgett described Snowden’s role transferring files from Fort Meade to Hawaii.; The Hawaii site lacked real‑time auditing software in 2012, creating a security gap.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-020218
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Snowden’s alleged 2012 data theft while contracted to Dell at NSA Hawaii backup site The passage provides a detailed narrative linking Edward Snowden, Dell, and NSA internal processes to a specific 2012 data exfiltration at the Hawaii facility. It offers concrete names (Snowden, Deputy Director Ledgett, Dell) and a location, but the claims repeat already‑publicly known allegations and lack new documentary evidence or financial details, limiting its investigative novelty and impact. Key insights: Snowden was employed by Dell as a system administrator for an NSA backup system in Hawaii.; Deputy Director Ledgett described Snowden’s role transferring files from Fort Meade to Hawaii.; The Hawaii site lacked real‑time auditing software in 2012, creating a security gap.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancensaedward-snowdendelldata-theftgovernment-contracting

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
66 CHAPTER SEVEN Crossing the Rubicon “What I came to feel is that a regime that is described as a national security agency has stopped representing the public interest and has instead begun to protect and promote state security interests. “ --Edward Snowden, interviewed in Moscow 2014 Soon after Snowden failed to get a SES job at the NSA, he intensified his rogue activities. At that time, Dell was tasked with building an enhanced backup system for the NSA in Hawaii. Deputy Director Ledgett explained that part of Snowden’s job as a system administrator under contract to Dell was transferring files held at Fort Meade to back-up computers in Hawaii. He “was moving copies of that data there for them, which was perfect cover for stealing the [NSA] data.” Snowden took advantage of this cover. Snowden expanded his own rogue operation, as Ledgett reconstructed the breach, through the fall and winter of 2012. There was little risk of him getting caught. The security measures at the Hawaii base presented no obstacles to him since, as a system administrator, he had privileges that allowed him to copy documents that had not been encrypted. Indeed, it was part of the process of building the backup system. The flaw he had pointed to in Japan in which system administrators working solo could safely steal files also existed in Hawaii. This time, however, instead of bringing it to the attention of the NSA, he used it to himself steal files. He could be confident that his 2012 thefts of documents would go undetected because the NSA’s base had not yet installed an auditing system. Such real-time auditing of the movement of documents, which was done at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade and most of the NSA’s regional facilities, had not yet been installed at the Hawaii base because a lack of bandwidth prevented the safe upgrading of the software. This auditing software was scheduled to be installed after the backup system was completed in 2013. The Kunia base was one of the last NSA bases which did not monitor suspicious transfers of files on a real-time basis. Snowden certainly was certainly aware of this deficiency. He later pointed out in his interview in Wired magazine in Moscow that the NSA base where he worked did not have an “audit” mechanism. This security gap allowed Snowden, using his system administrator’s credentials, to copy classified data to a thumb drive without anyone being able to trace the copied data back to him. And, according to the NSA’s subsequent damage assessment, he stole many thousands of pages while working for Dell in 2012 before he contacted journalists. Deputy Director Ledgett subsequently reported that the NSA analysis the 58,000 documents that were given by Snowden to journalists in June 2013 showed that most of them were taken by Snowden while he was still working at Dell.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

NSA audit software gaps enabled Snowden's 2012 data theft while at Dell

NSA audit software gaps enabled Snowden's 2012 data theft while at Dell The passage reiterates known facts about NSA audit deficiencies and Snowden's access, offering no new actors, dates, or transactions beyond what is already public. It provides limited investigative value and low novelty, though it does reference NSA infrastructure and inter‑agency data sharing. Key insights: NSA auditing software was not installed at the Hawaii (Kunia) base due to bandwidth limits.; Lack of real‑time file transfer monitoring allowed Snowden to copy data using admin credentials.; Snowden stole thousands of pages while employed by Dell in 2012.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The document contains only a header and no substantive information linking any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Document appears to be a placeholder or file identifier only; No names, dates, transactions, or allegations present

1p
House OversightNov 16, 2015

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts”

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts” The passage only provides a title and metadata for a 287‑page draft about the Snowden affair. It contains no specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations that could be pursued as an investigative lead. Consequently, it offers no actionable information and is likely already covered in public discourse. Key insights: Document appears to be a draft manuscript by Edward Jay Epstein.; Length indicated as 287 pages, suggesting extensive coverage.; Associated with a House Oversight file identifier (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153).

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Speculative timeline of Edward Snowden’s alleged recruitment by Russian intelligence and CIA/NSA internal decisions

The passage outlines unverified scenarios linking Snowden to Russian intelligence and mentions high‑level officials (Michael Morell, Gen. Keith Alexander) discussing counter‑measures. It provides date Three possible periods when Snowden may have been under Russian control (pre‑NSA, post‑Hong Kong, po Reference to CIA’s aborted 2009 investigation of Snowden and his resignation. Allegation that Snow

1p
House OversightUnknown

Snowden’s early NSA contractor onboarding details and subterfuge at Booz Allen

Snowden’s early NSA contractor onboarding details and subterfuge at Booz Allen The passage recounts already‑public information about Edward Snowden’s application fraud, hiring by Booz Allen, and his orientation at the NSA. It offers no new actors, transactions, or undisclosed evidence, limiting investigative usefulness. While it touches on NSA procedures, the content is well‑known and provides little actionable lead. Key insights: Snowden falsified a degree claim on his Booz Allen application.; He was hired as a trainee‑analyst but never worked at the Honolulu office.; Assigned to NSA’s National Operations Threat Center at Kunia base.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services The passage suggests Snowden stole a highly classified Congressional Budget Justification (the 2013 black budget) that details intelligence priorities and funding across multiple agencies. It claims the document would be valuable to adversary nations such as Russia’s SVR, implying a possible financial or strategic motive beyond whistleblowing. This provides a concrete lead (specific document, fiscal year, agencies) and ties to high‑level actors (NSA, CIA, President, Congress) and foreign intelligence services, making it a strong investigative angle, though the claim is unverified and relies on secondary commentary. Key insights: Snowden allegedly took the 2013 Congressional Budget Justification (black budget) while at Booz Allen.; The document lists funding and priorities for NSA, CIA, DIA, NRO, and other agencies.; Former CIA deputy director Michael Morell is quoted saying the SVR would pay millions for such a document.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.