Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Deposition Record of Paul G. Cassell in Edwards v. Dershowiz Case (Oct 16, 2015)
Case File
kaggle-ho-021825House Oversight

Deposition Record of Paul G. Cassell in Edwards v. Dershowiz Case (Oct 16, 2015)

Deposition Record of Paul G. Cassell in Edwards v. Dershowiz Case (Oct 16, 2015) The passage is a routine deposition transcript header with dates, locations, and attorney listings. It contains no substantive allegations, financial flows, or connections to powerful actors beyond the named lawyers, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Deposition took place on Oct 16, 2015 at 110 SE 6th St, Suite 1850, Fort Lauderdale, FL.; Parties: Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz.; Counsel includes Jack Scarola, Sigrid McCawley, Richard Simpson, and others.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-021825
Pages
1
Persons
9
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Deposition Record of Paul G. Cassell in Edwards v. Dershowiz Case (Oct 16, 2015) The passage is a routine deposition transcript header with dates, locations, and attorney listings. It contains no substantive allegations, financial flows, or connections to powerful actors beyond the named lawyers, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Deposition took place on Oct 16, 2015 at 110 SE 6th St, Suite 1850, Fort Lauderdale, FL.; Parties: Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz.; Counsel includes Jack Scarola, Sigrid McCawley, Richard Simpson, and others.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightlegaldepositioncourt-record

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the video record. Today is Friday, the 16th day of October, 2015. The time is 1:33 p.m. We are here at 110 Southeast 6th Street, Suite 1850, in Fort Lauderdale Florida for the purpose of taking the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell. The case is Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz. The court reporter is Terry Tomaselli and the videographer is Don Savoy, both from Esquire Deposition Solutions. Will counsel please announce their appearances for the record. MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola appearing on behalf of Bradley Edwards and Professor Paul Cassell. With me is Joni J. Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. MS. McCAWLEY: Sigrid McCawley on behalf of Virginia Roberts from Boies Schiller & Flexner. MR. SIMPSON: Richard Simpson on behalf of Defendant and Counter-Claim Plaintiff Alan Dershowitz. And with me is my colleague Nicole Richardson and Thomas Scott from the firm of Cole Scott & Kissane. Ms. Richardson and I are from the firm of Wiley Rein. MR. SWEDER: Kenneth Sweder from the firm of ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOct 17, 2015

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible obstruction of investigations. It names dates, documents, and individuals (e.g., [REDACTED - Survivor], Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova) that could be pursued for corroboration, document requests, or subpoenas. The claims are unverified but, if true, would be a major scandal involving a prominent legal figure and a billionaire sex‑trafficker, making it a high‑value investigative lead. Key insights: Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on an 89‑page Palm Beach Police report listing 23‑24 victims.; He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, suggesting a pattern of concealment.; Cassell references flight logs showing Dershowitz traveling with Epstein and a woman named “Tatiana” (potentially a minor) in 1998‑2005.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition Record of Paul G. Cassell in Edwards v. Dershowiz Case (Oct 16, 2015)

The passage is a routine deposition transcript header with dates, locations, and attorney listings. It contains no substantive allegations, financial flows, or connections to powerful actors beyond th Deposition took place on Oct 16, 2015 at 110 SE 6th St, Suite 1850, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Parties: Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz. Counsel includes Jack Scarola, Sigrid

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Deposition transcript metadata for Jeffrey Epstein-related civil case (Oct 2015)

Deposition transcript metadata for Jeffrey Epstein-related civil case (Oct 2015) The document is a standard deposition record showing counsel appearances, contact information, and exhibit references. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or new connections to high‑profile actors beyond the already public involvement of Jeffrey Epstein. Consequently, it offers minimal investigative value and low controversy. Key insights: Deposition taken on Oct 17, 2015, telephonically on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.; Counsel listed includes Darren K. Indyke, Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell, and others.; Exhibit numbers (e.g., 4, 5, 6) and Bates numbers (BE-510‑514) are noted.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.