Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case
Case File
kaggle-ho-021840House Oversight

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case The passage provides a minor procedural detail from a court filing, naming only lower‑profile attorneys (Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell). It lacks concrete leads about financial flows, misconduct, or high‑ranking officials, offering little actionable investigative value. Key insights: Mentions a joinder motion filed for Jane Doe #3 and #4 in a CVRA action.; Document signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards and counsel Paul G. Cassell (pro hac vice).; Appears to be a rough draft of a House oversight filing.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-021840
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Transcript excerpt referencing joinder motion in Jane Doe v. United States case The passage provides a minor procedural detail from a court filing, naming only lower‑profile attorneys (Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell). It lacks concrete leads about financial flows, misconduct, or high‑ranking officials, offering little actionable investigative value. Key insights: Mentions a joinder motion filed for Jane Doe #3 and #4 in a CVRA action.; Document signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards and counsel Paul G. Cassell (pro hac vice).; Appears to be a rough draft of a House oversight filing.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightcourt-filingprocedurallegal-documentjane-doe-litigation

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 17 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (4 Plaintiff's * Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - “ description was marked for identification. ) BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Mr. Cassell, do you have those documents in front of you? A. I do. Q. Okay. I'm going to ask you first about Exhibit 2 before 1, since exhibit 2 is first in chronological order. A. Yes. Q. Is this the motion for joinder that you filed on behalf of the parties then known as Jane Doe Number 3 and Jane Doe Number 4 in what was called the CVRA action? A. This is the joinder motion, yes. Q. Okay. And if you look at the last page before the certificate of service -- A. Yes. Q. -- over on page 12, it shows the document being signed by Bradley J. Edwards and then it says and Paul G. Cassell, pro hac vice, S.J. Queeny [sic] College of Law A. Quinney. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel List for Edwards v. Dershowitz Case Shows Utah Attorney General Involvement

The document only provides names and contact information for attorneys, including the Utah Attorney General’s office, but contains no substantive allegations, transactions, or actions linking powerful Sean D. Reyes listed as Utah Attorney General on the plaintiffs' side Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell are plaintiffs in a case against Alan Dershowitz Law firms and contact details are provide

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz Discusses Ties to Jeffrey Epstein and Alleged Sex Abuse in Interview

Alan Dershowitz Discusses Ties to Jeffrey Epstein and Alleged Sex Abuse in Interview The passage provides a concrete lead linking a high‑profile law professor and Harvard figure to Jeffrey Epstein, mentions a $50 million donation to Harvard, and references ongoing lawsuits (Edwards & Cassell vs. U.S. government and defamation suit against Dershowitz). These specifics (names, alleged transaction, legal filings) merit further investigation, though the claims are already publicly reported and lack new documentary evidence. Key insights: Dershowitz claims he was introduced to Epstein by Lady de Rothschild and was socially close to Epstein.; Reference to a $50 million contribution to Harvard from Epstein for evolutionary biology.; Mention of a 2008 plea deal that shielded Epstein from federal charges, now being challenged by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightUnknown

Deposition transcript metadata for Jeffrey Epstein-related civil case (Oct 2015)

Deposition transcript metadata for Jeffrey Epstein-related civil case (Oct 2015) The document is a standard deposition record showing counsel appearances, contact information, and exhibit references. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or new connections to high‑profile actors beyond the already public involvement of Jeffrey Epstein. Consequently, it offers minimal investigative value and low controversy. Key insights: Deposition taken on Oct 17, 2015, telephonically on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.; Counsel listed includes Darren K. Indyke, Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell, and others.; Exhibit numbers (e.g., 4, 5, 6) and Bates numbers (BE-510‑514) are noted.

1p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01296720

114p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Certificate of Service for Laura Menninger Declaration in House Oversight Case

The passage only lists attorneys and service details for a filing, providing no substantive allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile actors. It offers no actionable investigative l Document is a certificate of service dated Jan 6 2017. Names attorneys and law firms that were served. Includes contact information for each recipient.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.