Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-024541House Oversight

K12 virtual school operator profits from public education funds across 11 states

K12 virtual school operator profits from public education funds across 11 states The passage outlines how K12 (referred to as “12”) runs for‑profit virtual schools that receive full per‑student public funding while avoiding many costs of brick‑and‑mortar schools. It provides enrollment numbers, funding amounts, and revenue growth projections, suggesting a sizable flow of taxpayer money to a private company. However, it lacks specific names of officials, contracts, or alleged wrongdoing, limiting immediate investigative traction. Key insights: K12 operates virtual schools in 11 states plus D.C., serving ~18,000 students in FY 2006.; Public funds (~$5,300 per student) flow to K12, generating profits higher than traditional charter schools.; Revenue projected to grow from $3 M (FY 2006) to $11 M (FY 2008) for district‑managed programs.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-024541
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

K12 virtual school operator profits from public education funds across 11 states The passage outlines how K12 (referred to as “12”) runs for‑profit virtual schools that receive full per‑student public funding while avoiding many costs of brick‑and‑mortar schools. It provides enrollment numbers, funding amounts, and revenue growth projections, suggesting a sizable flow of taxpayer money to a private company. However, it lacks specific names of officials, contracts, or alleged wrongdoing, limiting immediate investigative traction. Key insights: K12 operates virtual schools in 11 states plus D.C., serving ~18,000 students in FY 2006.; Public funds (~$5,300 per student) flow to K12, generating profits higher than traditional charter schools.; Revenue projected to grow from $3 M (FY 2006) to $11 M (FY 2008) for district‑managed programs.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancevirtual-schoolseducation-fundingpublic‑private-partnershipk12-inc.charter-schools

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
whereby 12 sets up and manages the "virtual public’ school. 12 offers an Internet-based curriculum (providing the computer hardware and all necessary materials) outside of the conventional brick-and- mortar setting of traditional public and charter schools. Where legislation has enabled such schools, state education dollars pay for children who enroll in them. Virtual schools generally generate substantially larger profits than conventional for-profit charter schools because they receive the same amount of per- student funding as their traditional public schocl counterparts despite not having to support a physical structure. Virtual schools enable students to receive a comprehensive curriculum along with technical assistance, teacher involvement, compufer equipment, Internet access, and instructional materials, without leaving the public education system. Virtual academies are serving a diverse mix of students. With the same curriculum, k12 is serving both highly gifted children and children with disabilities. The self-paced nature of k12’s curriculum and its interactivity allow k12 to serve a broad array of students. 12's students, currently in virtual schools, come from public or private schooling backgrounds, as well as home schooling backgrounds. A summary of k12's virtual schoo! business is as follows: B «12 manages virtual schools for students in grades K-9 in 11 states (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin) plus the District of Columbia. In the 2006 fiscal year, these schools had a combined enrollment of approximately 18,000 children. i &12 managed schools typically produce test score results which exceed or are equal to state averages at a cost fo the taxpayer that is approximately 70% less than what they would pay for traditional school. & Virtual schocls are funded primarily through local, state, and federal sources, which k12 expects to receive approximately $5,300 per student per school year on average. Therefore, the virtual schools provide access to k12’s world-ciass service and curriculum as well as certified teachers at no cost to the family. EB While many of 412’s virtual academies are charter schools, 412 has virtual schools that are not charter schools but are programs of school districts or other authorized schocl agencies, such as public universities and federal and state agencies. District-Managed Schools, kti2’s district-managed virtual programs operate under the contract schools model. Although somewhat similar to the virtual public schools, contract schools are public schools operated by private organizations based on management agreements with local school boards. Unlike charter schools, contract schools do not require specific statutory authority but are created through a contract between a school management company and a schoo! board in accordance with existing authority. k12 typically employs the district-managed virtual programs in states where the reimbursement rate is low. Two states where 412 currently has district-managed virtual programs are Kansas and Utah. The district-managed virtual programs unit is expected to grow revenue from $3 million in FY 2006 to $11 million in FY 2008. The Pennsylvania Department of Education commissioned KPMG Consulting to study virtual education in that state. The October 2001 study stated that the Pennsylvania Virtual Charter School (which uses the k12 curriculum and management services) “was considered to be the highest quality program based on the curriculum analysis.” 12 believes that the virtual school market has powerful growth prospects which are outlined below: ® Strong reenroilment rates. 412 benefits from stable demand for its curriculum and services which is reflected by current reenrollment rates of approximately 70%. @ Increasing existing school enrollment rates. Existing school enrollments continue to increase at double digit rates. BR Expansion into new states. 412 is currently evaluating opportunities to start new virtual schools in several additional states. 108

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Comprehensive Overview of U.S. AML Laws, Agencies, and Enforcement Actions

The document is a generic reference guide summarizing existing AML statutes, agency roles, and past enforcement actions. It contains no new allegations, specific transactions, or undisclosed relations Lists major U.S. AML statutes (BSA, USA PATRIOT Act, etc.) Identifies federal and non‑bank regulators and law‑enforcement agencies Describes typical enforcement tools (CMPs, DPA, consent orders)

29p
House OversightUnknown

Cowen report highlights strong EBITDA margins and growth forecasts for CBD companies Charlotte’s Web and CV Sciences

Cowen report highlights strong EBITDA margins and growth forecasts for CBD companies Charlotte’s Web and CV Sciences The passage provides financial performance data and growth projections for publicly traded cannabis firms, but it does not link any high‑ranking officials, government agencies, or controversial actions. It offers limited investigative value beyond standard market analysis. Key insights: Charlotte’s Web and CV Sciences report EBITDA margins above 30% in the most recent quarter.; Charlotte’s Web projected 2018 revenue of $65‑80 million and 2019 revenue of $120‑170 million.; Analysts expect continued double‑digit growth through 2020, with market consolidation anticipated.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Industry overview of Curaleaf, CV Sciences, Elixinol, and Green Thumb Industries CBD product lines (Feb 2019)

Industry overview of Curaleaf, CV Sciences, Elixinol, and Green Thumb Industries CBD product lines (Feb 2019) The passage provides a market‑focused summary of several publicly traded cannabis/MSO companies and their product expansions. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials, but it does mention revenue figures and growth rates that could be useful for baseline industry analysis. Because it lacks any reference to powerful actors, controversial actions, or actionable leads, its investigative value is limited. Key insights: Curaleaf launched a CBD line sold in 47 states, targeting pharmacy chains and grocery stores.; Curaleaf reported ~$45 M revenue for FY9M18 with 247% YoY growth and 57% gross margin.; CV Sciences’ PlusCBD Oi! brand generated ~$34 M revenue FY9M18, 153% YoY growth, 72% gross margin.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Synthetic Cannabis Overview Lacks Investigative Leads

Synthetic Cannabis Overview Lacks Investigative Leads The document is a generic informational summary about cannabinoids with no mention of individuals, transactions, or wrongdoing. It provides no actionable leads, novel allegations, or connections to powerful actors. Key insights: Describes types of cannabinoids and FDA approvals.; Lists potential therapeutic uses of various phytocannabinoids.; Cites Cowen and Company as source.

1p
House OversightNov 21, 2016

BofA 2017 Rates, FX & EM Trade Recommendations Referencing Trump and Xi Policies

BofA 2017 Rates, FX & EM Trade Recommendations Referencing Trump and Xi Policies The document is an internal investment strategy memo that mentions political leaders only in the context of macroeconomic forecasts. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flow details, or evidence of misconduct involving high‑level officials, making it a low‑value lead for investigation. Key insights: Predicts two and a half Fed hikes in 2017‑18 despite expected fiscal easing by the Trump administration.; Recommends buying USD/JPY based on anticipated Japanese bond yield policy and a Trump win.; Suggests buying USD call/CNH put, citing a ‘collision course’ between Trump’s need for a weak USD and Xi’s need for a weak CNY.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.