Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

DOJ Cole Memo outlines cannabis enforcement priorities and mentions AG Jeff Sessions' 2017 Senate hearing remarks
Case File
kaggle-ho-024707House Oversight

DOJ Cole Memo outlines cannabis enforcement priorities and mentions AG Jeff Sessions' 2017 Senate hearing remarks

DOJ Cole Memo outlines cannabis enforcement priorities and mentions AG Jeff Sessions' 2017 Senate hearing remarks The passage merely restates publicly known DOJ guidance and a routine Senate hearing comment, offering no new actionable leads, novel information, or direct ties to powerful actors beyond a standard policy statement. Key insights: Cole Memo (2013) sets eight enforcement priorities for marijuana-related offenses.; Guidance applies to marijuana, money laundering, unlicensed money transmitter, and Bank Secrecy Act cases.; Jeff Sessions referenced the memo during his 2017 confirmation hearing, noting resource constraints and not pledging never to enforce federal law.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-024707
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

DOJ Cole Memo outlines cannabis enforcement priorities and mentions AG Jeff Sessions' 2017 Senate hearing remarks The passage merely restates publicly known DOJ guidance and a routine Senate hearing comment, offering no new actionable leads, novel information, or direct ties to powerful actors beyond a standard policy statement. Key insights: Cole Memo (2013) sets eight enforcement priorities for marijuana-related offenses.; Guidance applies to marijuana, money laundering, unlicensed money transmitter, and Bank Secrecy Act cases.; Jeff Sessions referenced the memo during his 2017 confirmation hearing, noting resource constraints and not pledging never to enforce federal law.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightcannabis-policydoj-guidancecole-memojeff-sessionsfederal-enforcement

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
> A “na Plan cre O CHAPTER IV U.S. Legal Landscape U.S. Department of Justice: The Cole Memo A memorandum published by the DOJ in August 2013 (Cole Memo) provides guidance to DOJ attor- neys and federal law enforcement about prosecuting cannabis-related federal offenses. The Cole Memo asserts that marijuana is a dangerous drug, that illegal distribution of marijuana is a serious crime which provides revenue to criminal enterprises and that the DOJ is committed to enforcing marijuana-related violations of federal law. The Cole Memo also notes, however, that the DOJ is committed to using its limited investigative and prosecutorial resources to address the most significant threats in the most effective, consistent and rational way. The Cole Memo guides DOJ attorneys and federal law enforcement to focus on the following eight enforcement priorities when considering prosecutions for marijuana-related CSA violations (and also, according to a Cole Memo update issued in February 2014, when considering prosecutions for marijuana-related violations of the federal money laundering statute, the unlicensed money transmitter statute and the Bank Secrecy Act): 1. Preventing distribution of marijuana to minors. 2. Preventing revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels. 3. Preventing the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states. 4. Preventing state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity. 5. Preventing violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana. 6. Preventing drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use. 7. Preventing the growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands. 8. Preventing marijuana possession or use on federal property. The Cole Memo notes that whether marijuana-related conduct implicates any of these enforce- ment priorities should be a primary question in considering prosecution and that in states with legal- ized marijuana and effective regulatory systems, conduct in compliance with state law is less likely to threaten these priorities. The Cole Memo has provided some comfort to those operating state-legal cannabis businesses that do not interfere with the enumerated enforcement priorities. However, the Cole Memo merely reflects internal guidance within the DOJ and does not create a legal defense for any violation of federal law. During the January 2017 Senate confirmation hearings for current U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, in a discussion about the enforcement priorities outlined in the Cole Memo, Mr. Sessions acknowledged the “problem of resources for the federal government” and stated that he thought some of the enforcement priorities were “truly valuable in evaluating cases,” but he also stated that he would not commit to never enforcing federal law. © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC 71

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01290001

PA Deutsche Bank P.O. Box 1776, Baltimore, MD 21203 SOUTHERN TRUST COMPANY INC 610 0 RED HOOK QUARTER B3 ST THOMASVI 0 0 BO 2 NMI:Iv .. nl Ncelh.....gtmest Marini <petal< C404 O.M,1M IlardiSr:wiDei Inc ryed a )45 PoNt Att %v. )60 Ficxx Nerd 'CM% 10154 ROM. *GC 14, SIAS Cote 164455 5641 December 1,2017 - December 31, 2017 Account Number Portfolio a: a Glance This Period YeaMotolo Your Investment Specialist. BEGINNINGACCOUNT VALUE $3,584,810.33 87,865,268.31 JOSHUA SHOSHAN

104p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged Draft Indictment Strategy Targeting President Trump for Obstruction by Mueller Team

Alleged Draft Indictment Strategy Targeting President Trump for Obstruction by Mueller Team The passage describes alleged internal documents and strategy discussions about a potential obstruction indictment against President Trump, naming several senior officials and outlining a timeline of alleged obstruction acts. While it provides a narrative and names key players (Mueller, Rosenstein, Giuliani, Flynn, Comey, McCabe), it offers no verifiable documents, dates of filings, or concrete transaction details. The lead is moderately useful for investigators seeking to locate the referenced “proposed charges” or to corroborate the existence of a draft indictment, but its speculative nature and lack of hard evidence limit its immediate investigative value. Key insights: Claims that Mueller’s team prepared a draft obstruction indictment as early as April 2017.; Alleged requirement that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein approve any indictment of the President.; Specific alleged obstruction acts: Trump’s requests to Comey, firing of Comey and McCabe, attempts to influence Flynn’s plea, and use of pardon power.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01329726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION - MIKE MONRON EY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION APPLICATION 1) LerE0 STATES RECISTRA1 ION N 722JE RORER a 1 iredesal C TYPE CO REGSTRATICH 0 I POWS'0*/ 0 a cans (3 4 CO- are (CTRS eV tat) 0 5 OsOnTO1 0 7 UTSKI USW COTO* (US) 0 a Wan* Colsatcw 0 a Ncnasin Capwas Copse, 2) AIRCRAFT VANSACRER ANO IVOR.IL KEYSTONE HELICOPTER S.76C N ARCRAFT SERIAL WARIER 5) NAVE(S) OF APR iCAM

64p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01417278

Subject: RE: Account Plannin sessions [C] [I] From: Stewart Oldfield Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:34:50 -0500 To: Cynthia Rodriguez Bradle Gillin Bcc: From: Cynthia Rodriguez Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 12:05 PM To: Stewart Oldfield Subject: RE: Account Planning sessions [C] [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi, Bradley Gillin Attached are the final two. Please give them your blessing or make whatever changes needed and I will send it all to Samantha. I have saved the ones

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.