Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-028084House Oversight

Israeli cabinet discussion on Scud attacks and U.S. coalition pressures during Gulf War

Israeli cabinet discussion on Scud attacks and U.S. coalition pressures during Gulf War The passage records internal deliberations among senior Israeli politicians (Shamir, Meridor, Olmert) about military response to Scud attacks in 1991. While it mentions high‑profile officials, it provides no new evidence of misconduct, financial flows, or covert actions, and the content is already part of the historical record. It offers limited investigative leads beyond confirming known diplomatic friction. Key insights: Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir resisted immediate retaliation against Scud attacks despite pressure.; Likud politicians Dan Meridor and Ehud Olmert participated in the discussion.; Israeli officials considered sending a delegation to Washington to convey concerns to the Bush administration.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-028084
Pages
1
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Israeli cabinet discussion on Scud attacks and U.S. coalition pressures during Gulf War The passage records internal deliberations among senior Israeli politicians (Shamir, Meridor, Olmert) about military response to Scud attacks in 1991. While it mentions high‑profile officials, it provides no new evidence of misconduct, financial flows, or covert actions, and the content is already part of the historical record. It offers limited investigative leads beyond confirming known diplomatic friction. Key insights: Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir resisted immediate retaliation against Scud attacks despite pressure.; Likud politicians Dan Meridor and Ehud Olmert participated in the discussion.; Israeli officials considered sending a delegation to Washington to convey concerns to the Bush administration.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightgulf-warisrael‑u.s.-relationsmilitary-decision‑makingscud-missileshistorical-cabinet-minutes

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
young Likud politicians, Dan Meridor and Ehud Olmert, with whom I had become friendly. They, like me, were concerned about undermining the Americans’ military and diplomatic coalition. Shamir mostly listened, until very near the end. He then asked Dan Meridor, Misha and me to join him in a separate room. He asked each of us for our views. Misha, even more strongly then in front of the full cabinet, argued that we could not allow night after night of missile attacks without responding. Meridor reiterated his opposition, stressing the damage we’d risk doing to the Americans’ war effort by possibly weakening Arab support for their attack on Saddam. When Shamir turned to me, I said that if the government did decide on military action, we were ready. From a purely military and security point-of- view, I said, an attack made absolute sense. Even if we didn’t succeed in destroying, or even finding, the mobile launch sites, putting a military force on the ground would almost surely lead to a dramatic reduction in the number of Scud launches. But, echoing Meridor, I added that a military response would carry a price in our relationship with the Americans. My view was that, at least for now, we should hold off. When we rejoined the meeting, Shamir rapped his hand on the table. In the startled silence that followed, he said he shared many ministers’ urge to hit back against the Scuds. But he said: “At this stage, we’re not going to do anything. We bite our lips and wait.” Three nights later, his resolve was stretched almost to breaking point. Missiles landed in the Tel Aviv suburb of Ramat Gan, and nearly 40 homes were damaged. A three-story house was flattened. In all, nearly 100 people were injured, and three elderly residents died of heart attacks. On the night of January 25, another seven Scuds hit. Nearly 150 apartments were badly damaged, and a 51-year-old man was killed. The pressure on Shamir was all the greater because the Ramat Gan attack had come within range of one of the Americans’ Patriot batteries. The Patriots had been originally designed not as anti-missile weapons, but to attack aircraft, and they seemed to have been ineffective. Nor were American air strikes in Iraq stopping the Scuds. Though American jets had taken out a few fixed launch sites, they were having no luck with finding and destroying mobile launch vehicles. Even Shamir now felt that unless the Americans got the mobile launchers, we would have to attack military action. I was sent to Washington along with Misha and David Ivri, a former air force commander, to deliver that message to the Bush administration. From the first days after Saddam’s attack on Kuwait, 236

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of 2011 Opinion Articles on Middle East Policy

The document is a curated list of editorial pieces and commentary from various publications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial data, or actionable evidence linking specific powerful indiv Elliott Abrams suggests the Obama administration may be motivated by a hoped‑for Israeli‑Syrian peac Article on U.S.–Saudi split notes Saudi troops in Bahrain and criticism of U.S. policy, without sp

38p
House OversightUnknown

Israeli Prime Minister’s Camp David Statement Reflects Disappointment Over Unmet Peace Steps

Israeli Prime Minister’s Camp David Statement Reflects Disappointment Over Unmet Peace Steps The passage is a personal recollection without specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations. It mentions President Clinton and Camp David but provides no concrete leads on misconduct, financial flows, or illegal activity, making it low‑value for investigation. Key insights: Speaker identifies as Israeli Prime Minister and former special‑forces commander.; Expresses disappointment that planned peace initiatives over the past 14 days did not materialize.; References a prior meeting with President Bill Clinton at Camp David a year earlier.

1p
House OversightApr 2, 2012

Table of Contents for a 401‑page manuscript on free speech and personal biography

Table of Contents for a 401‑page manuscript on free speech and personal biography The passage only lists chapter titles and word counts, providing no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. It lacks any substantive investigative value. Key insights: Document is 401 pages, 191,694 words; Covers personal biography and free‑speech history; No specific individuals, dates, or financial details mentioned

1p
House OversightUnknown

Israeli cabinet deliberations on Scud attacks and potential US‑Israel military coordination (1990‑91)

Israeli cabinet deliberations on Scud attacks and potential US‑Israel military coordination (1990‑91) The passage reveals internal Israeli cabinet debate, involving future prime minister Ehud Olmert and former foreign minister Dan Meridor, about responding to Iraqi Scud attacks and the pressure from US‑led coalition. It mentions a planned delegation to Washington to convey Israel’s stance, suggesting a possible back‑channel diplomatic effort. While the names and context are known, the specific reference to a secret meeting with Shamir and the timing of a US‑Israel liaison could provide a concrete lead for further archival or FOIA requests on US‑Israeli coordination during the Gulf War. Key insights: Shamir convened a closed‑door session with Dan Meridor, Misha (likely a senior official), and the author to gauge opinions on a military response to Iraqi Scuds.; Olmert and Meridor expressed concerns about damaging US‑Israeli relations if Israel acted militarily.; Three nights of Scud attacks on Tel Aviv suburbs increased pressure on Shamir to consider retaliation.

1p
House OversightNov 29, 2017

Israeli Prime Minister’s reflective statement after Camp David meeting with President Clinton

Israeli Prime Minister’s reflective statement after Camp David meeting with President Clinton The passage is a personal narrative lacking specific allegations, transaction details, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑profile figures (the Israeli PM and President Clinton) but provides no concrete evidence of misconduct, financial flows, or policy breaches, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: Speaker identifies as Israeli Prime Minister, former special‑forces commander.; Reference to a recent meeting at Camp David with President Bill Clinton.; Expresses disappointment over unspecified outcomes of the past two weeks.

1p
House OversightMay 16, 2011

Compilation of 2011 Opinion Articles on Middle East Policy

Compilation of 2011 Opinion Articles on Middle East Policy The document is a curated list of editorial pieces and commentary from various publications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial data, or actionable evidence linking specific powerful individuals to wrongdoing. The only potential leads are vague references to U.S. policy choices, Saudi‑U.S. tensions, and historical analyses, none of which provide verifiable details for further investigation. Key insights: Elliott Abrams suggests the Obama administration may be motivated by a hoped‑for Israeli‑Syrian peace deal, but offers no evidence.; Article on U.S.–Saudi split notes Saudi troops in Bahrain and criticism of U.S. policy, without specific incidents or documents.; Multiple pieces discuss the stalled Israeli‑Palestinian peace process and speculation about Syrian negotiations, lacking concrete data.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.