Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-028086House Oversight

Alleged 1990s Iraq Scud‑Intercept Plan Discussed by President, Cheney, and Senior Officials

Alleged 1990s Iraq Scud‑Intercept Plan Discussed by President, Cheney, and Senior Officials The passage describes a conversation about a proposed air‑ground assault on Iraqi Scud launchers, mentioning the President, Vice‑President Cheney, and a senior official (likely Colin Powell), as well as Israeli Prime Minister Shamir. It provides no concrete evidence, dates, or documentation of orders, and the details are largely narrative and already known in broad terms about coalition operations during the Gulf War. While it hints at high‑level coordination, it lacks actionable specifics such as dates, unit identifiers, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: President allegedly discussed a direct military strike on Iraqi Scud sites with Vice‑President Cheney and a senior U.S. official.; Reference to a planned combined air‑mobile force involving paratroops and F‑15E jets.; Mention of British SAS deployment of ~700 commandos, equipment, and casualties.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-028086
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Alleged 1990s Iraq Scud‑Intercept Plan Discussed by President, Cheney, and Senior Officials The passage describes a conversation about a proposed air‑ground assault on Iraqi Scud launchers, mentioning the President, Vice‑President Cheney, and a senior official (likely Colin Powell), as well as Israeli Prime Minister Shamir. It provides no concrete evidence, dates, or documentation of orders, and the details are largely narrative and already known in broad terms about coalition operations during the Gulf War. While it hints at high‑level coordination, it lacks actionable specifics such as dates, unit identifiers, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: President allegedly discussed a direct military strike on Iraqi Scud sites with Vice‑President Cheney and a senior U.S. official.; Reference to a planned combined air‑mobile force involving paratroops and F‑15E jets.; Mention of British SAS deployment of ~700 commandos, equipment, and casualties.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancegulf-warmilitary-operationsiraqscud-missilesus‑israel-coordination

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
The President responded by suggesting we go to the Pentagon and talk in greater detail about how, for both our countries’ benefit, that could be avoided. When we convened in Secretary Cheney’s office, I delivered the same message, but more forcefully. I felt it was essential not only to make it clear we serious about taking action, but that we had the military capability to do so. So I told Secretary Cheney and Colin what we were planning. I said we intended to launch a combined air and ground assault by an air-mobile force and our best paratroop units. At that point, Colin, who was clearly worried, suggested the two of us withdraw to speak “soldier to soldier.” We retreated to his office. Spreading out a map of western Iraq, I went into greater detail, explaining how we would remain in the Iraqi desert on a search-and-destroy mission against the mobile launchers. Colin stressed the efforts the Americans were making from the air, and the commitment they’d shown to Israel. Not only had they delivered the Patriots. They had allocated their best fighter jets, F-15E’s, to the task of taking out the Scuds. It helped that he and I had got to know and respect each other, so it wasn’t an all-out argument. But I reiterated that if the Scud attacks kept up, we would have to act. “We will act,” I said. For a few seconds, he said nothing. But as we headed back to join the others, he told me that only a few hours ago, he had briefed American commanders on an anti-Scud operation by “allied forces” like the one we were planning. “It will happen,” he assured me. “Within 48 hours.” That task fell to Britain’s SAS. The operation was almost exactly the same as the one we’d planned. A force of nearly 700 commandos was helicoptered in to Iraq’s western desert, equipped with Jeeps and Land Rovers, and anti-tank missiles and laser targeting capability. They were also able to call on attack helicopters and F-15 jets if necessary. The operation did not prove easy, quick, or entirely successful. The British troops blocked the main roads and patrolled them. But they did not find or destroy a single mobile launcher. They ended up in gun battles with Iraqi troops. The SAS lost something like two dozen men. Five were part of a group that got separated from the others and ended up freezing to death in the February cold. All of the men risked their lives, with incredible determination and bravery, in an operation to secure the safety of Israel’s civilian population. And I have no doubt that the outcome, like the plan, would have been almost identical if we had done it ourselves. And it did have an effect. As I’d told Prime Minister Shamir when briefing him on our attack plan, the very fact of a military presence on the ground made a dramatic difference. The number, accuracy and impact of the Scuds dropped off steeply. A few missiles kept coming, however. Since we did not yet have a 238

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged perpetual state of emergency and covert COG use linking Bush, Obama, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Nixon

The passage mixes historically verifiable statements (e.g., emergency declarations, Nixon’s air‑marshals) with unsubstantiated claims about a never‑repealed emergency, secret COG abuse, and personal t Claims a state of emergency declared on Sep 14 2001 remains in effect and is renewed annually by bot Alleges the Reagan era and the “Halloween Massacre” introduced illegal COG (continuity of governme

2p
House OversightJan 5, 2018

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content The file contains only a title and file identifier with no substantive information, names, dates, transactions, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads or novel insights into any controversial actions or actors. Key insights: File appears to be a placeholder or index page; No mention of individuals, agencies, or financial details

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Opinion piece on censorship, comedy, and cultural politics post‑9/11

The passage is an editorial commentary that mentions public figures (e.g., Ted Stevens, Lynne Cheney, Ari Fleischer) but provides no concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable evidence o Mentions Senator Ted Stevens advocating stricter cable censorship. References Lynne Cheney’s alleged influence on Department of Education curriculum. Cites Ari Fleischer warning comedians about polit

5p
House OversightUnknown

Email hints at alleged personal connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and possible intimidation by unknown parties

Email hints at alleged personal connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and possible intimidation by unknown parties The passage contains vague references to "new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell" and mentions individuals linked to a Stone Ridge board, but provides no concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It suggests possible intimidation or surveillance, yet lacks verifiable facts or clear connections to high‑profile actors, limiting investigative usefulness. Key insights: Mentions Ghislaine Maxwell in a cryptic context.; References Stone Ridge board membership and a former classmate relationship.; Alleges personal communications were tracked and bribed.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged permanent emergency declaration and secret security designations linked to 9/11 agenda

Alleged permanent emergency declaration and secret security designations linked to 9/11 agenda The passage mixes historical assertions with personal allegations but provides no verifiable names, dates, or transaction details that can be directly pursued. It mentions high‑level actors (Obama, Bush, Nixon, Rumsfeld, Cheney) and a claim of a continuously renewed emergency declaration, yet offers no documentary evidence or specific legal references, limiting its investigative utility. Key insights: Claim that a state of emergency declared on September 14, 2001 has been renewed annually by Bush and Obama.; Allegation that the Posse Comitatus Act has not been repealed despite permanent military involvement in domestic affairs.; Reference to a 1970 Nixon air‑marshals initiative as a precursor to a '9/11 agenda'.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email referencing Ghislaine Maxwell, Stone Ridge board, and alleged 9/11‑linked “New World Order” speech

Email referencing Ghislaine Maxwell, Stone Ridge board, and alleged 9/11‑linked “New World Order” speech The passage mentions a handful of names (Richard Beckler, Ken Adams, Matthew Horton, Stone Ridge, a former classmate) and a vague claim linking a 1990 Bush speech to 9/11 conspiracies, but provides no concrete dates, transactions, or verifiable allegations. It suggests possible personal grievances and a speculative “New World Order” narrative, offering limited actionable leads. Key insights: Sender claims his daughters are “new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell”.; Reference to Stone Ridge board membership of Richard Beckler’s father.; Allegation that communications were being tracked and bribed during a 2011 IBM case.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.